Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Rustam HS. Akili
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Netralitas Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Pada Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Anib Bastian; Rustam Hs. Akili; Yusrianto Kadir
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v3i2.3721

Abstract

The neutrality of the Indonesian National Police (POLRI) in holding general elections is an important prerequisite for the integrity and success of the democratic process in Indonesia. In this context, the neutrality of the National Police reflects its ability to carry out state duties without taking sides with certain political interests. The National Police has a crucial role in ensuring security, order and justice during the elections, including securing voting locations, enforcing the law against election violations, and providing a sense of security to the public. However, maintaining the neutrality of the National Police is not an easy task. The National Police is faced with various challenges, such as political pressure, intervention by certain interests, and threats to the security of its personnel. Nevertheless, the National Police has developed various strategies to overcome these challenges and maintain its neutrality during the elections.
Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Money Politik di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gorontalo Stepi Ayu; Rustam Hs. Akili; Roy Marthen Moonti; Muslim A. Kasim
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1725

Abstract

The problem of election violations in the form of money politics continues to be a challenge in the democratization process in Indonesia, including in Gorontalo Regency. Although regulations have been strictly regulated in Law Number 7 Year 2017, the implementation of law enforcement against money politics still faces various obstacles. This study aims to analyze the obstacles faced by law enforcement officials, especially the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), in taking action against money politics violations during the implementation of the General Election in Gorontalo Regency. This type of research is empirical juridical research, with a qualitative approach and using interview techniques with Bawaslu commissioners as the main data source. The main findings show that the main obstacles come from weak evidentiary instruments, a deeply rooted transactional political culture in the community, and Bawaslu's limited authority in the law enforcement process. In addition, the lack of public participation in reporting violations is a factor that contributes to weakening the effectiveness of law enforcement. The conclusion of this study confirms that the success of law enforcement against money politics is largely determined by the synergy between strong regulations, independent and professional supervisory institutions, and public political awareness. Therefore, it is recommended that strengthening the institutional capacity of Bawaslu, reformulating regulations regarding the proof of money politics violations, and increasing public political education be prioritized in the electoral reform agenda in the regions.
Analisis Hubungan Kerja Antara Satreskrim dan Satintelkam Polri dalam Pengungkapan Tindak Pidana di Polres Pohuwato Nurdiana Lestari; Rustam Hs. Akili; Nurmik K. Martam
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i4.945

Abstract

The working relationship/coordination between Satreskrim and Satintelkam in uncovering criminal offences at Pohuwato Police Station has not gone well. Field Guidelines (Juklap) of the National Police Chief number 189 of 1993 regulates the Relationship between the Working Procedures of the Resersepol Function (Police Detection) and the Intelpampol Function (Police Intelligence and Security) in the context of integrated crime handling, which should be the basis for implementing working relationships, not implemented. The level of coordination and collaboration between Satreskrim and Satintelkam at Polres Pohuwato shows an unstable and often situational cooperation. Collaboration is optimal in large or urgent cases, but is minimal in normal situations. The level of effectiveness of criminal offence disclosure is largely determined by how strong cross-unit collaboration is built on an ongoing basis. The need for a formal HTCK (Working Procedure Relationship) between Satreskrim and Satintelkam to clarify authorities, responsibilities, and cooperation mechanisms. Increased integrated and cross-functional training to equalise perceptions, increase trust, and reduce sectoral ego. And Polres leaders need to play an active role as mediators and motivators in building open and collaborative communication between units. Establish a permanent cross-unit coordination team facilitated by the Chief of Police and Deputy Chief of Police, to ensure continuity of coordination, not just during major cases. Regular evaluation and monitoring of the quality of coordination, through periodic cross-functional communication forums. And the implementation of a reward and punishment system to increase the commitment of members to the importance of collaboration in disclosing criminal offences.
Co-Authors Anib Bastian Muslim A. Kasim Nurdiana Lestari Nurmik K. Martam Roy Marthen Moonti Stepi Ayu Yusrianto Kadir