Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERANG DAN LIYAN: KAJIAN FEMINISME EKSISTENSIALIS DALAM NOVEL LAMPUKI KARYA ARAFAT NUR Gunawan, Dedek
MIMESIS Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): JULI 2022
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/mms.v3i2.6065

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the existence of women as the other in the novel Lampuki by Arafat Nur, which raises the theme of conflict in Aceh. This novel shows more of the daily life of the conflict-stricken community so that the situation and position of women can be seen more deeply, namely in the community itself. Furthermore, the analysis will focus on three female characters who represent the general situation of Acehnese women during the conflict. The theory used in this study is existentialist feminism, developed by Simone de Beauvoir. This study uses the qualitative descriptive method. The results showed that society's deeply rooted patriarchal culture is the biggest challenge preventing women from achieving freedom and actualizing themselves. Halimah and Siti viewed their status as wives. In other words, they are part of their husbands. However, the condition of women who do not have a husband is not better, such as Rukiya, who still needs men or is not independent. This lack of independence is due to the social construct that makes women always dependent on men. In Beauvoir's view, men place themselves as subjects and women as objects whose existence is to be subdued. Furthermore, the fate of marginalized women, and dependence on men, including being victims in the conflict, is the result of the objectification that occurs to them.
Legal Certainty of Case Settlement Criminal Acts After Bankcrupty Decision Gunawan, Dedek
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5636

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty in the settlement of criminal cases after a bankruptcy decision is a complex and important issue in the Indonesian legal system. In this case, the settlement of criminal cases after a bankruptcy decision poses a challenge, due to the differences between the principles of bankruptcy and criminal law. A bankruptcy decision that results in the settlement of debt obligations through the process of asset liquidation can conflict with the settlement of criminal acts involving criminal sanctions for perpetrators of the crime. This study aims to examine the legal certainty related to the settlement of criminal cases that occur after a bankruptcy decision, as well as to analyze the role and limitations of existing laws in efforts to resolve such criminal cases. By using a normative approach and analysis of applicable laws and regulations, the results of this study are expected to provide a clear picture of the relationship between bankruptcy law and criminal law in order to ensure legal certainty for the parties involved. Legal certainty is needed so that the process of resolving criminal cases is not disrupted by bankruptcy status, and to maintain justice for both creditors and parties involved in criminal acts. In conclusion, this study suggests that there should be harmonization between bankruptcy provisions and criminal acts so that there is no legal uncertainty in resolving criminal cases after a bankruptcy decision.