Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Hasanuddin Law Review
Dahlan, Nur Khalidah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Exploring The Legal Subjectivity of Artificial Intelligence in Incitement to Suicide Zhaoxun, Cao; Rajamanickam , Ramalinggam; Dahlan, Nur Khalidah
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 1: April 2024: Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v12i1.1369

Abstract

The development of conversational artificial intelligence (AI) has not only brought about technological innovations but has also given rise to legal issues. The phenomenon of AI-induced suicide highlights the multifaceted legislative demands within the criminal domain for AI. In-depth research into the issues of suitability concerning suicide victims, AI, and regulatory entities becomes particularly necessary. Through literature analysis and comparative legal analysis, this article aims to provide theoretical support for the legal delineation of liability in the context of AI incitement to suicide. Specifically, this article conducts a thorough investigation and comprehensive analysis of relevant legal literature both in China and internationally. The objective is to clarify the legal positions and real challenges surrounding the issue of AI incitement to suicide. Consequently, this article explores whether AI should be considered a legal subject and how, in different contexts, suicide victims and AI regulatory entities should share corresponding responsibilities. As for the findings, AI should not be regarded as an independent legal subject. Based on the theories of victim self-entrapment risk and omission in criminal law, in various situations, suicide victims or AI regulatory entities should bear corresponding responsibilities for the events of incitement to suicide. By delving into the legal liability issues of AI in incitement to suicide, this article provides a theoretical basis for comprehensive AI legislation in the future, demonstrating theoretical innovation. Furthermore, the exploration of criminal legal regulation contributes to the construction of a more comprehensive and rational legal framework for AI.
Academic Misconduct Responsibilities: An Empirical Comparison Using 35 Chinese Cases as a Foundation Cao, Wenze; Cao, Zhaoxun; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Dahlan, Nur Khalidah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i1.5696

Abstract

This article undertakes a comprehensive exploration of academic misconduct by employing a robust comparative and empirical approach. It meticulously examines 35 representative cases from China, delving into the diverse manifestations of academic misconduct such as fund project evaluation interference, fraud, paper trading, improper authorship, and multiple submissions. Through in-depth legal analysis, it not only investigates the infringements on intellectual property rights and public legal interests but also proposes the application of strict liability in tort law. To enhance the regulatory framework, the article advocates for clearer criminalization criteria for severe academic misconduct. It further extends the discussion to incorporate the roles of academic institutions, the challenges in enforcement, and a more expansive legal framework. By drawing on international experiences and best practices, it formulates comprehensive and actionable suggestions for reforming China's academic misconduct regulations, aiming to address this issue effectively on both national and international levels.
Academic Misconduct Responsibilities: An Empirical Comparison Using 35 Chinese Cases as a Foundation Cao, Wenze; Cao, Zhaoxun; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Dahlan, Nur Khalidah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i1.5696

Abstract

This article undertakes a comprehensive exploration of academic misconduct by employing a robust comparative and empirical approach. It meticulously examines 35 representative cases from China, delving into the diverse manifestations of academic misconduct such as fund project evaluation interference, fraud, paper trading, improper authorship, and multiple submissions. Through in-depth legal analysis, it not only investigates the infringements on intellectual property rights and public legal interests but also proposes the application of strict liability in tort law. To enhance the regulatory framework, the article advocates for clearer criminalization criteria for severe academic misconduct. It further extends the discussion to incorporate the roles of academic institutions, the challenges in enforcement, and a more expansive legal framework. By drawing on international experiences and best practices, it formulates comprehensive and actionable suggestions for reforming China's academic misconduct regulations, aiming to address this issue effectively on both national and international levels.
Co-Authors Cao, Wenze Cao, Zhaoxun Rajamanickam , Ramalinggam Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Zhaoxun, Cao