Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Ghani Bayhaqi, Naufal
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
An Examination of the Application of Law No. 2 of 2012 Regarding Land Procurement for Projects in the Public Interest, Focusing on the Resolution of Land Disputes for the Construction of Kediri Airport Arifin, Zainal; Puasa Handayani, Emi; Ghani Bayhaqi, Naufal
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Publisher : International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59712/iaml.v3i2.89

Abstract

This research endeavors to address two primary research questions regarding the disputes arising in the land acquisition process for the development of an airport in Kediri. Firstly, it investigates the nature of disputes occurring during the land acquisition process for airport construction in Kediri. Secondly, it examines the resolution of land acquisition disputes for the airport development in Kediri and assesses its conformity with Law Number 2 of 2012. Employing an empirical method with a qualitative approach, this study provides insights into the aforementioned research inquirie. The findings reveal persistent challenges in land acquisition for the airport development in Kediri. The resolution of land disputes in Kediri's Airport development project does not fully adhere to the provisions of Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning land acquisition for public interest development. The mechanism of consensus-building meetings (musyawarah mufakat) proves ineffective due to power imbalances between the airport authorities and the local community. Mediation processes fail to yield agreements due to the unpreparedness of involved parties and the lack of mediator professionalism. Moreover, consignment (konsinyasi) often falls short of being an effective solution as the local community lacks adequate knowledge and comprehensive information regarding the consignment process.
Development of a Compensation Mechanism and Legal Reporting Framework for Consumers Arifin, Zainal; Puasa Handayani, Emi; Ghani Bayhaqi, Naufal
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): November, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i3.36234

Abstract

This study aims to formulate a more effective and efficient compensation mechanism for consumers harmed by business practices in Indonesia and to analyze the obstacles encountered in the legal reporting process by consumers. The research employs a normative approach, involving an in-depth review of applicable legislation, case law, and relevant literature. The findings reveal that, despite various regulations governing consumer protection, there are still several weaknesses in the compensation mechanisms and the legal reporting process. Consumers frequently face difficulties in obtaining fair and prompt compensation and encounter complex and time-consuming reporting procedures. These issues stem from several factors, including a lack of consumer legal awareness, ambiguities in regulatory formulations, and weak law enforcement. Based on these findings, the study concludes that there is a need to reformulate both the compensation mechanisms and the consumer legal reporting process Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merumuskan mekanisme ganti rugi yang lebih efektif dan efisien bagi konsumen yang dirugikan oleh tindakan pelaku usaha di Indonesia, serta menganalisis hambatan dalam proses pelaporan hukum yang dilakukan oleh konsumen. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan melakukan kajian mendalam terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, yurisprudensi, serta literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat berbagai peraturan yang mengatur perlindungan konsumen, masih terdapat beberapa kelemahan dalam mekanisme ganti rugi dan proses pelaporan hukum. Konsumen seringkali menghadapi kesulitan dalam memperoleh ganti rugi yang adil dan cepat, serta menghadapi prosedur pelaporan yang rumit dan memakan waktu. Hal ini disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor, antara lain kurangnya kesadaran hukum konsumen, ketidakjelasan dalam rumusan peraturan, serta lemahnya penegakan hukum. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perlu dilakukan reformulasi terhadap mekanisme ganti rugi dan proses pelaporan hukum konsumen.
Co-Authors Puasa Handayani, Emi Zainal Arifin