Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin
Sahri , Fidri
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstruksi Yuridis terhadap Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 46/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Srg berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang –Undangan Sahri , Fidri; Juanda, Juanda
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Juli-September 2023)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v2i2.284

Abstract

The crime of money laundering (TPPU) does not stand alone because the assets that are placed, transferred, or diverted by means of integration are obtained from criminal acts, with other criminal acts that precede it (predicate crime). There are twenty-six types of predicate crimes obtained from the proceeds of TPPU assets as stipulated in Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 8 of 2010. Basically these activities consist of three steps which each stand alone but are often carried out together as contained in the case with Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn. Srg. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach. Based on the results of the research, it can be seen that the juridical construction is considered by the judge in deciding case number 46/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn. Srg. When viewed based on legal principles, the application of these articles is appropriate for the criminal acts committed by the defendants, but based on the principle of justice, the decisions issued by the Panel of Judges are deemed unable to fulfill a sense of justice.
Co-Authors Veithzal Rivai Zainal