Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Riset Agama PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender
Hadiana, Shinta Nuriyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Polemik Periwayatan Hadis bil Ma’na: Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail dan Mahmud Abu Rayyah Hadiana, Shinta Nuriyah; Muhid, Muhid
Jurnal Riset Agama Vol 4, No 2 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jra.v4i2.33750

Abstract

The narration of the hadith bil ma’na is a topic that gives rise to debate and differences of opinion among Muslim scholars and scholars. Some controversy has arisen regarding caution in interpreting the meaning of hadith outside the text, fearing that this could open the door to subjective interpretations or deviations from the original teachings. There are several figures who have an influence on the study of hadith, especially regarding the narration of bi al-ma'na, one of which is interesting to study is Syuhudi Ismail and Mahmud Abu Rayyah in understanding the narration of Hadith bi al-ma'na. This research aims to find out how Syuhudi Ismail and Mahmud Abu Rayyah think regarding the polemic of the narration of the hadith bi Al-Ma'na, then compare the thoughts of the two figures to find similarities and differences in their thoughts regarding the narration of the hadith bi al-ma'na. This research uses a qualitative approach with a review of literature studies. The research results show that Syuhudi Ismail tends to be more flexible in accepting the narration of the bil ma’na hadith, provided that the core meaning of the hadith is maintained. On the other hand, Mahmud Abu Rayyah showed a more cautious approach and tended not to allow the narration of bi al-ma'na, because he was worried about the possibility of changing the original meaning. Although both aim to maintain the validity of the meaning of the hadith.
Polemik Periwayatan Hadis bil Ma’na: Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail dan Mahmud Abu Rayyah Hadiana, Shinta Nuriyah; Muhid, Muhid
Jurnal Riset Agama Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jra.v4i2.33750

Abstract

The narration of the hadith bil ma’na is a topic that gives rise to debate and differences of opinion among Muslim scholars and scholars. Some controversy has arisen regarding caution in interpreting the meaning of hadith outside the text, fearing that this could open the door to subjective interpretations or deviations from the original teachings. There are several figures who have an influence on the study of hadith, especially regarding the narration of bi al-ma'na, one of which is interesting to study is Syuhudi Ismail and Mahmud Abu Rayyah in understanding the narration of Hadith bi al-ma'na. This research aims to find out how Syuhudi Ismail and Mahmud Abu Rayyah think regarding the polemic of the narration of the hadith bi Al-Ma'na, then compare the thoughts of the two figures to find similarities and differences in their thoughts regarding the narration of the hadith bi al-ma'na. This research uses a qualitative approach with a review of literature studies. The research results show that Syuhudi Ismail tends to be more flexible in accepting the narration of the bil ma’na hadith, provided that the core meaning of the hadith is maintained. On the other hand, Mahmud Abu Rayyah showed a more cautious approach and tended not to allow the narration of bi al-ma'na, because he was worried about the possibility of changing the original meaning. Although both aim to maintain the validity of the meaning of the hadith.
NEGOTIATING PIETY AND PROFESSIONALISM: Hadith, Patriarchy, and the Digital Contestation of Muslimah’s Roles in Islamic Fashion Hadiana, Shinta Nuriyah; Rochmawati, Ida; Ilmiyah, Dakhirotul; Fahimah, Rifiyatul
PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender Vol 18, No 2 (2025): PALASTREN
Publisher : IAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/palastren.v18i2.34318

Abstract

This article analyzes the negotiation between piety and professionalism in the discourse rejecting Muslimah (Muslim women) as models for Islamic fashion on social media. This study employs a qualitative netnographic approach, utilizing the Mubādalah (reciprocal or mutual) framework to analyze digital content from the Instagram account @raehanul_bahraen, specifically related to religious narratives on women and modesty. The findings indicate that hadiths related to modesty, decency, and dress codes are frequently simplified and instrumentalized as moral legitimization tools that tend to reinforce patriarchal structures. However, through Mubādalah hermeneutic analysis, this meaning is reoriented from symbolic prohibition toward reciprocal ethical principles that emphasize shared moral responsibility between men and women. Muslim women’s identities in digital spaces emerge as active agents who negotiate piety, autonomy, and self-expression within the dynamics of religious commodification and algorithmic governance. The integration of netnography and Mubādalah highlights the importance of contextual and inclusive reinterpretation of hadith, fostering a more participatory, ethical, and just understanding of Islam within the contemporary digital religious landscape.
Co-Authors Dakhirotul Ilmiyah Fahimah, Rifiyatul Ida Rochmawati, Ida Muhid, Muhid