Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum West Science Interdisciplinary Studies West Science Interdisciplinary Studies
Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS AKIBAT DIKELUARKANNYA SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 02 TAHUN 2023 Ayu Masariandari, Luh Putu; Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 6 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i06.p10

Abstract

Riset ini mengambil judul “Analisis Yuridis Akibat Dikeluarkannya Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 02 Tahun 2023” dengan tujuan untuk membahas mengenai akibat hukum dikeluarkannya surat edaran mahkamah agung nomor 02 tahun 2023 serta menganalisis mengenai kedudukan sema dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia. Penulisan karya ilmiah ini mempergunakan metode riset hukum normatif, yakni mempergunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (the statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (Case approach). Melalui dua pemecahan masalah dapat disimpulkan bahwa riset ini menunjukkan dengan dikeluarkannya sema no 2 tahun 2023 ini dapat memberikan perlawanan yang cukup kuat untuk mendobrak polemik perkawinan yang berbeda agama. Dengan keberadaan putusan MK nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 dan 24/PUU XX/2022 yang dilengkapi dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No. 02 Tahun 2023 mengenai perintah kepada hakim agar mengadilim perkara tersebut dengan menolak permohonan pencatatan perkawinannya dapat memberikan kepastian hukum terkait pencatatan perkawinan hingga direvisinya Pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga perihal ini menjadi angin segar bagi penyelenggara peradilan untuk menangani polemik perkawinan beda agama. ABSTRACT This research takes the title "Juridical Analysis of the Effects of the Issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 02 of 2023" with the aim of discussing the legal consequences of the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 02 of 2023 and analyzing the position of sema in the legal system in Indonesia. The writing of this scientific work uses normative legal research methods, namely using a statutory approach (the statute approach) and a case approach. Through two problems solving, it can be concluded that this research shows that the issuance of sema no 2 of 2023 can provide a strong enough resistance to break the polemic of marriages of different religions. With the existence of the Constitutional Court's decisions number 68/PUU-XII/2014 and 24/PUU XX/2022 which are complemented by the Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 02 of 2023 regarding the order for judges to hear the case by rejecting the application for marriage registration, it can provide legal certainty related to marriage registration until the revision of articles in the legislation so that this is a breath of fresh air for judicial administrators to deal with the polemics of marriages of different religions.
Overlapping Regional Regulations on Subak in Bali and Their Conflict with National Law Abitha Satria, I Gede; Yusa, I Gede; Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh
West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 3 No. 05 (2025): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wsis.v3i05.1887

Abstract

Subak is a traditional Balinese agrarian system recognized by UNESCO as a World Cultural Heritage. However, its sustainability faces serious threats due to regulatory overlaps between regional and national legislation, particularly regarding the protection of agricultural land. This study aims to examine the normative conflict between regional regulations in Bali and Law Number 41 of 2009 on the Protection of Sustainable Agricultural Land. Using a normative juridical method and statutory approach, the research reveals substantial differences in the regulation of Subak land use. Several regional bylaws permit the conversion of agricultural land for development purposes, which contradicts national legal norms that emphasize the preservation of sustainable agriculture. The study recommends regulatory harmonization and policy revision at the regional level to align with the goals of Subak protection and national food sovereignty.
Overlapping Regional Regulations on Subak in Bali and Their Conflict with National Law Abitha Satria, I Gede; Yusa, I Gede; Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh
West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 3 No. 05 (2025): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wsis.v3i05.1887

Abstract

Subak is a traditional Balinese agrarian system recognized by UNESCO as a World Cultural Heritage. However, its sustainability faces serious threats due to regulatory overlaps between regional and national legislation, particularly regarding the protection of agricultural land. This study aims to examine the normative conflict between regional regulations in Bali and Law Number 41 of 2009 on the Protection of Sustainable Agricultural Land. Using a normative juridical method and statutory approach, the research reveals substantial differences in the regulation of Subak land use. Several regional bylaws permit the conversion of agricultural land for development purposes, which contradicts national legal norms that emphasize the preservation of sustainable agriculture. The study recommends regulatory harmonization and policy revision at the regional level to align with the goals of Subak protection and national food sovereignty.
Normative Conflict Between the State Finance Law and the State-Owned Enterprises Law Regarding the Status of Separated State Assets Marselina, Putu Prisca; Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh
West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 3 No. 08 (2025): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wsis.v3i08.2189

Abstract

This study aims to examine the contradiction between the legal perspectives in Law No. 17/2003 concerning state finances and Law No. 19/2003 concerning State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) regarding separate state assets, and to investigate the legal ramifications of these contradictions on the responsibility and transparency of information in BUMN governance. This study employs normative legal research methodology using statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials including relevant laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials from academic literature, legal books, and scientific journal articles. The research findings indicate fundamental legal perspective differences between the two laws regarding separated state assets. The State Finance Law adopts a broad conception that separated state assets remain part of state finance under public law regime, while the SOE Law adopts a strict separation principle where such assets are no longer part of state assets but become SOE assets under corporate accountability system. This normative conflict creates contradiction in terminis that weakens the application of lex specialis derogat legi generali principle. The legal implications include the creation of a dual accountability system that burdens SOE management, confusion regarding transparency standards between corporate and public transparency, and ambiguity in corporate governance authority and responsibilities that generates high regulatory risk for SOE managers.
Normative Conflict Between the State Finance Law and the State-Owned Enterprises Law Regarding the Status of Separated State Assets Marselina, Putu Prisca; Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh
West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 3 No. 08 (2025): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wsis.v3i08.2189

Abstract

This study aims to examine the contradiction between the legal perspectives in Law No. 17/2003 concerning state finances and Law No. 19/2003 concerning State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) regarding separate state assets, and to investigate the legal ramifications of these contradictions on the responsibility and transparency of information in BUMN governance. This study employs normative legal research methodology using statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials including relevant laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials from academic literature, legal books, and scientific journal articles. The research findings indicate fundamental legal perspective differences between the two laws regarding separated state assets. The State Finance Law adopts a broad conception that separated state assets remain part of state finance under public law regime, while the SOE Law adopts a strict separation principle where such assets are no longer part of state assets but become SOE assets under corporate accountability system. This normative conflict creates contradiction in terminis that weakens the application of lex specialis derogat legi generali principle. The legal implications include the creation of a dual accountability system that burdens SOE management, confusion regarding transparency standards between corporate and public transparency, and ambiguity in corporate governance authority and responsibilities that generates high regulatory risk for SOE managers.
Metode Rule Identification Urgency Solution (RIUS) dalam Penyusunan Naskah Akademik Peraturan Daerah Rumiartha, I Nyoman Prabu Buana; Gede Astariyani, Ni Luh; Sukma Wedayanti, Ni Kadek Ari; Yasana Putri, Kadek Angelina
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 17, No 2 (2023): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.183-196

Abstract

The purpose of this research was conducted to offer a new method in the preparation of academic texts on laws and regulations. Academic Manuscripts contain the results of research regarding the contents of the content or proposals submitted to be regulated in a provision of statutory regulations and or regional regulations. Provisions related to the preparation of academic manuscripts have been regulated in laws and regulations, but a special method is needed in preparing academic manuscripts so that they are in accordance with the needs of the community. In this study using normative legal research methods. The findings in this study are that there is a novelty method that can be used in the preparation of academic manuscripts, namely the Rule Identification Urgency Solution (RIUS). With the RIUS method, an academic text can be used as a basis or basis for argumentation in the formation of laws and regulations or regional regulations. In conclusion, the RIUS method is a method that can analyze the rule of law, identify problems, the urgency of why these regulations are needed, and the solutions that can be provided. The RIUS method was first applied by researchers in preparing academic texts for regional regulations in the Badung Regency Government and Jembrana Regency Government, in this case researchers as experts in preparing academic manuscripts. Suggestions that can be given are that in the preparation of academic papers it is best to focus on analyzing what problems occur in society so that a regulation is needed.
Co-Authors Abitha Satria, I Gede Ayu Masariandari, Luh Putu I Gede Yusa I Nyoman Prabu Buana Rumiartha, I Nyoman Prabu Buana Marselina, Putu Prisca Sukma Wedayanti, Ni Kadek Ari Yasana Putri, Kadek Angelina