Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Alam Wibowo, Richard Jatimulya
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI DOKTRIN UNJUST ENRICHMENT DALAM PEMANFAATAN CIPTAAN UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN KECERDASAN BUATAN GENERATIF Alam Wibowo, Richard Jatimulya; Saly, Jeane Neltje
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i03.p15

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi implementasi doktrin pengayaan yang tidak jujur dalam pemanfaatan Ciptaan untuk pengembangan kecerdasan buatan generatif. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual untuk melihat regulasi yang berlaku sekaligus mencoba menegaskan doktrin dan dasar filosofis hukum yang ada. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konsep doktrin pengayaan yang tidak jujur tercermin dalam sistem hukum perdata di Indonesia, yang secara khusus mengatur mengenai perlindungan hak cipta terhadap hak moral dan hak ekonomi Pencipta. Lebih lanjut, doktrin pengayaan yang tidak jujur dapat berperan untuk memberikan perlindungan yang lebih kuat terhadap Pencipta dan Pemegang hak cipta ketika Ciptaan yang menjadi haknya digunakan untuk pengembangan kecerdasan buatan generatif. Hal ini dikarenakan doktrin pengayaan yang tidak jujur didasarkan pada prinsip dasar hak kepemilikan, dan terbebas dari batasan perikatan yang muncul karena perjanjian maupun perundang-undangan. This research aims to analyze and identify the implementation of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in the use of Creation for the development of generative artificial intelligence. This normative juridical research was carried out using a statutory and conceptual approach to look at the applicable regulations while trying to confirm the existing legal doctrine and philosophical basis. This research shows that the concept of the doctrine of unjust enrichment is reflected in the civil law system in Indonesia, which regulates explicitly copyright protection for the moral and economic rights of Creators. Furthermore, the doctrine of unjust enrichment can provide stronger protection for creators and copyright holders when the work they are entitled to is used to develop generative artificial intelligence. This is because the doctrine of unjust enrichment is based on the basic principle of ownership rights, and is free from limitations that arise due to agreements or legislation.
Ciptaan dan Invensi Hasil Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Perspektif Hak Cipta dan Paten Alam Wibowo, Richard Jatimulya
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 17, No 3 (2023): November Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.269-288

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has developed in such a way that it is capable of producing creations and inventions without human intervention through the training of a number of datasets. This normative juridical research aims to look at AI problems from the perspective of AI as a subject and AI results as an object of copyright and patent protection, as well as examining the implications of using creations in datasets to train AI. This research found that AI cannot become a creator and inventor because moral and human rights are reserved for humans, besides that AI cannot take advantage of the economic rights obtained from the protection of creation or patents. This study also found that the use of datasets containing other people’s creations as AI development material has the potential to cause copyright violations. This potential is mitigated by several countries by implementing regulations related to TDM or data scraping for AI machine learning. Finally, this study also found that creations and inventions resulting from AI in general cannot become objects protected by the copyright regime unless they receive direct human contribution or are formulated in statutory regulations such as in the CGW copyright regime in the UK. This research suggests that practices in other countries in copyright and patent protection regimes related to AI can be used as a reference for legal politics in Indonesia to create AI regulations that balance the moral and economic rights of Creators and Inventors with the pace of AI innovation.
Co-Authors Jeane Neltje Saly