Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peningkatan Kapasitas Masyarakat dalam Pencegahan Judi Online di Desa Kalibaru, Kecamatan Cilincing, Jakarta Utara Tahun 2024 Ririn Nurhidayanti; Fransiska Milenia Cesarianti; Samsuto Samsuto; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/cakrawala.v3i3.3139

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of online gambling prevention socialization activities and their impact as well as the establishment of a village corner library in Kalibaru Village, Cilincing District, North Jakarta. Through a participatory method, this research involves the public directly in socialization that discusses the dangers and negative impacts of online gambling, including legal, mental health, and social aspects. In addition, the village corner library was established as a learning center that provides access to related literature to increase public awareness. The results of the study show that socialization and the establishment of libraries significantly increase public knowledge and awareness about the risks of online gambling. The active participation of the community in the socialization and utilization of libraries indicates the success of this intervention. The conclusion of this study is that a community-based approach, through education and literacy improvement, is an effective strategy in preventing online gambling and strengthening people's capacity to face social challenges.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Kasus Putusan Ma Nomor 196 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017 Sema Mengatur yang Tidak Seharusnya Gunawan Widjaja; Ririn Nurhidayanti
Bulletin of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Bulletin of Community Engagement
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/bce.v4i2.1333

Abstract

In 2016, PT Ramaldi Praja Sentosa, a company specializing in aircraft parts procurement and component repair, was rocked by a severe financial crisis. This crisis was triggered by the embezzlement of funds by one of its directors, leading to the company's inability to meet its financial obligations and ultimately filing for bankruptcy. The Central Jakarta Commercial Court rejected the petition due to the failure to meet the formal requirement of written consent from creditors as per the Supreme Court Circular Letter (Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung) SEMA Number 2 of 2016. The Supreme Court then upheld this decision in cassation No. 196 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2017. This analysis delves into the reasons for the rejection of the bankruptcy petition, based on the provisions in Law No.37 of 2004 regarding Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment (UUK-PKPU) and SEMA No.2/2016. It also underscores the implications of creditors' inactivity in providing consent to the bankruptcy mechanism. This case serves as a clear instance of the Supreme Court's overreach, as it issued SEMA with unnecessary guidance that is not in line with Law No.37 of 2004 regarding Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment.