Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Amaliah Faradibah
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Mathematics

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Indonesian Journal of Data and Science

 1 
Comparison Analysis of Random Forest Classifier, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network Performance in Multiclass Brain Tumor Classification Amaliah Faradibah; Dewi Widyawati; A Ulfah Tenripada Syahar; Sitti Rahmah Jabir; Lokapitasari Belluano, Poetri Lestari
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v4i2.73

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the performance of three main classification models, namely Random Forest Classifier, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network, in classifying Multiclass brain tumors based on MRI images. The research method includes exploratory data analysis (EDA), dataset preprocessing with image segmentation using the Canny method, and feature extraction using the Humoment method. The performance of the classification models is evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The analysis results show variations in the performance of the three classification models, with Random Forest Classifier having an accuracy of 0.7, weighted precision of 0.55, weighted recall of 0.7, and weighted F1 score of 0.59; Support Vector Machine having an accuracy of 0.71, weighted precision of 0.5, weighted recall of 0.71, and weighted F1 score of 0.59; and Artificial Neural Network having an accuracy of 0.62, weighted precision of 0.6, weighted recall of 0.62, and weighted F1 score of 0.61. Visualization using box plots also reveals outliers in the performance of the three models. These findings indicate variations and outliers in the performance of the classification models for Multiclass brain tumor classification. Further analysis is needed to understand the factors that influence performance differences and identify ways to improve the classification model performance for brain tumor diagnosis based on MRI images
Comparison Analysis of Classification Model Performance in Lung Cancer Prediction Using Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machine Dewi Widyawati; Amaliah Faradibah; Lestari Lokapitasari Belluano, Poetri
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v4i2.76

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the performance of three classification models, namely Decision Tree Classifier, Support Vector Machine, and Naive Bayes Classifier, in predicting lung cancer using the "Lung Cancer Prediction" dataset. The performance evaluation metrics used include accuracy, precision weighted, recall weighted, and F1 weighted. As a preliminary step, exploratory data analysis (EDA) and dataset preprocessing, including feature selection, data cleaning, and data transformation, were conducted. The test data results showed that the Decision Tree Classifier and Naive Bayes Classifier had similar performances with high accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 values. Meanwhile, the Support Vector Machine also exhibited competitive performance, although its precision weighted value was slightly lower. Additionally, an outlier analysis was conducted using box plots, revealing that the Decision Tree Classifier had 2 outlier values, while the Support Vector Machine had 4 outlier values, and Naive Bayes had no outlier values. In conclusion, all three classification models demonstrated good potential in lung cancer prediction. However, selecting the best model requires consideration of relevant evaluation metrics for the application and accommodating the limitations of each model. Further evaluation and in-depth analysis are needed to ensure the reliability of the models in predicting lung cancer cases more accurately and consistently.
Design and Build an Automatic Spraying System for Shallot Plants using Soil Moisture and Air Temperature Sensors with the Fuzzy Method Abdul Rachman Manga'; Dedy Atmajaya; Amaliah Faradibah
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v6i2.213

Abstract

Agriculture utilizes biological resources to produce food, industrial raw materials, energy sources, and manage the environment. This sector plays a strategic role in national economic development. This research aims to design an automatic spraying system for shallot plants based on soil moisture using soil moisture sensors. This system utilizes soil moisture sensors to detect the water content in the soil as well as soil moisture sensors to measure the air humidity around the plants. Data from both sensors are processed by the microcontroller to regulate the timing and duration of the spraying. The prototype of this system was built using soil moisture sensors, soil moisture sensors, microcontrollers, water pumps, solenoid valves, and other supporting components. Testing was conducted in the field with red onion plants as the test subjects. The results show that the system is capable of functioning effectively in watering plants based on soil moisture levels. The sensor works accurately in measuring water content, while the microcontroller successfully controls the spraying optimally. The implementation of this system has proven to increase water usage efficiency and support better growth of red onion plants. Thus, this automatic spraying system offers an environmentally friendly and efficient solution for irrigation based on soil moisture and soil moisture sensors.
Co-Authors A Ulfah Tenripada Syahar Abdul Rachman Manga' Dedy Atmajaya Dewi Widyawati Lokapitasari Belluano, Poetri Lestari Sitti Rahmah Jabir