Razak, Muhamad Abdul
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Model GBHN dalam Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Ditinjau dari Sistem Pemerintahan Menurut UUD NRI 1945 Septaviana, Diana; Razak, Muhamad Abdul
Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No.1 Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sjp.v2i1.14118

Abstract

The assembly of the civil servants (MPR) brought planning on enforcing the constitution (bill) of 1945, with the addition of one verse in chapter 3 that authorized the MPR to change and establish points of state (PPHN). The problem is that there are varying GBHN views. Those supporting the state's course felt that the country's course was important. The Indonesian government has a strong opinion of its leaders. Research employs a type of study of normative (normative), which isa kind of study by study and includes isa analyses under another regulatory rule and written source. Studies have shown that those who support the state's course feel that the country's course is important. A country's course is necessary for an Indonesian nation especially developing country to give power in both direction and certainty to development countries' goals. The views of those who disagree with a country's course also have their thoughts. The vice plan could give MPR a way to become the highest institution again. When GBHN or the state course is re-enforced, the MPR can seize the President at any time. There is also the thought that enacting a course of the state could actually set democracy back.
Komparasi Bentuk Negara dan Batasan Kekuasaan pada Konstitusi di Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Swiss Razak, Muhamad Abdul; Septaviana, Diana
Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No.1 Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sjp.v2i1.13990

Abstract

Various countries of the world certainly have constitutions, since constitutions are one of the first few conditions for the establishment and development of an independent nation, and so is its genes in countries' existence. Constitutions are enacted in countries around the world including Indonesia, the United States, and Switzerland. Indonesia became interesting to study. The United States, and Switzerland are countries of the world that have a constitution. The constitution became essential to Indonesia, the United States, and Switzerland. Indonesians. Research used the normative- juridical kind of study to find rules of law, principles of law, or legal doctrines to provide answers to the legal issues at hand. The first will be discussed on the constitutionality of the state. According to the constitution Indonesia acknowledges the existence of a united state. While the federal system structure of the United States has developed over a long period of time. While in Switzerland, the constitution and federal laws ensure cantonese autonomy with the principle of subsidies ensure that all duties not explicitly assigned to the federal level are in cantonese responsibility. The next aspect considered is the difference between constitutional restrictions and supervision of power in Indonesia, the United States, and Switzerland.