Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justisia Ekonomika Jurnal Ruhul Islam
prasheila kusmastuti, ines
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN SETTLING MUSYARAKAH AGREEMENT DISPUTES prasheila kusmastuti, ines; Al Muazzami, Al Muazzami
Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justeko.v8i2.23580

Abstract

Judges in deciding cases of sharia economic dispute resolution must consider sharia principles such as the DSN Fatwa. In fact, there are still decisions that do not consider sharia principles even though the case handled is a musyarakah contract financing dispute. This research method is normative to examine the judge's consideration in resolving musyarakah contract financing disputes. The secondary data of this research was obtained through literature study and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of this study are that the legal rules used by judges are incomplete. Judges who should apply sharia principles do not use DSN Fatwas such as DSN Fatwa No. 08/DSN-MUI/ IV/2000 concerning Musyarakah Financing and DSN Fatwa No. 42/DSN-MUI/VIII/2004 concerning Ta'widh as a consideration. The nominal ta'widh charged to the defendant was also deemed inappropriate due to the absence of evidence of real losses suffered by the plaintiff. The findings of this research are expected to be a consideration, especially for judges in the Religious Courts who handle sharia economic disputes. Judges are expected to explore the legal aspects and sharia principles completely so that the resulting decisions reflect justice, certainty, and expediency while still based on sharia principles.
ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN SETTLING MUSYARAKAH AGREEMENT DISPUTES prasheila kusmastuti, ines; Al Muazzami, Al Muazzami
Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justeko.v8i2.23580

Abstract

Judges in deciding cases of sharia economic dispute resolution must consider sharia principles such as the DSN Fatwa. In fact, there are still decisions that do not consider sharia principles even though the case handled is a musyarakah contract financing dispute. This research method is normative to examine the judge's consideration in resolving musyarakah contract financing disputes. The secondary data of this research was obtained through literature study and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of this study are that the legal rules used by judges are incomplete. Judges who should apply sharia principles do not use DSN Fatwas such as DSN Fatwa No. 08/DSN-MUI/ IV/2000 concerning Musyarakah Financing and DSN Fatwa No. 42/DSN-MUI/VIII/2004 concerning Ta'widh as a consideration. The nominal ta'widh charged to the defendant was also deemed inappropriate due to the absence of evidence of real losses suffered by the plaintiff. The findings of this research are expected to be a consideration, especially for judges in the Religious Courts who handle sharia economic disputes. Judges are expected to explore the legal aspects and sharia principles completely so that the resulting decisions reflect justice, certainty, and expediency while still based on sharia principles.
Tanggung Renteng Perusahaan Grup Perspektif Hukum Perusahaan dan Hukum Islam Prasheila Kusmastuti, Ines
Jurnal Ruhul Islam Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ruhul Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33476/jri.v2i1.136

Abstract

Tanggung renteng menjadi salah satu upaya pertanggungjawaban bersama pada perusahaan grup ketika terdapat pihak ketiga yang dirugikan. Namun dalam penerapannya, seringkali menimbulkan ketidakadilan dikarenakan belum adanya aturan terkait pertanggungjawaban perusahaan induk terhadap perusahaan anak. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tanggung renteng perusahaan grup perspektif Hukum Perusahaan dan Hukum Islam. Jenis penelitian ini normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tanggung renteng terhadap perusahaan induk merujuk pada KUHPerdata dan pasal 3 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas mengingat perusahaan induk dan perusahaan anak masih menjadi komponen hukum perseroan. Kedudukan perusahaan induk dan perusahaan anak yang terpisah secara yuridis tidak lantas menghapuskan tanggung jawab perusahaan induk selaku pemegang saham ketika terdapat pihak ketiga yang dirugikan. Tanggung renteng pada perusahaan induk merupakan solusi yang tepat dan sesuai dengan konsep al-‘Adl dalam arti persamaan hak sebagaimana terdapat pada surah An-Nisa ayat 58 dan 135. Apabila nominal ganti rugi dihitung berdasarkan kesalahan yang dilakukan akan menimbulkan ketidakadilan dan merugikan salah satu pihak. Solusinya diharapkan segera dibentuk pengaturan khusus terkait perusahaan grup untuk menciptakan kepastian hukum. 
Co-Authors Al Muazzami, Al Muazzami