<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to determine the partial influence of work motivation on employee performance, to determine the partial influence of workload on employee performance, to determine the simultaneous influence of work motivation and workload on employee performance at PT. State Savings Bank (PERSERO) Tbk. Bintaro Jaya Branch Office. This research method uses a quantitative description method, data collection techniques using questionnaires. The population is 134 employees, sampling can use the Slovin formula, so the sample is all consumers totaling 100 employees. Data analysis uses validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple regression analysis, multiple correlation coefficient analysis, coefficient of determination analysis and hypothesis testing, t-test calculation results for the Work Motivation variable (X1) with a tcount of 4.845 and a significance of 0.000. Because tcount is greater than ttable (4.845 > 1.984) and the significance is smaller than 5%, Ha1 is accepted and H01 is rejected, it can be stated that Work Motivation (X1) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). Based on the results of the t test calculation for the workload variable (X2) with a t count of 7.570 and a significance of 0.000. Because tcount is greater than ttable (7.570 > 1.984) and the significance is smaller than 5% (0.000), Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, it can be stated that workload (X2) has a significant effect on employee performance (Y). Based on the results above, namely the ANOVA test, the Fcount value was 81.374, while the Ftable ( 0.05) for n = 97 was 2.70. So Fcount > from Ftable ( 0.05) or 81,374 > 2.70, with a significant level of 0.000 because 0.000 < 0.05, then it can be said that Work Motivation (X1), Workload (X2) and together have an influence on Employee Performance (Y).]]>
