Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education La Ogi : English Language Journal
Karmila, Ria
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Astronomy Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN STUDENTS’ WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF BATANGHARI Ridwan, Adang; Karmila, Ria
La Ogi : English Language Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2024): July
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, LP3M Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55678/loj.v10i2.1607

Abstract

The aim of this study was to grammatical errors in students’ writing descriptive text at second semester English Language Education at Universitas Islam Batanghari. This is a qualitative research, the research employing documentation to collect data and data analysis in this research was descriptive analysis. The result of the study showed that the common types of grammatical errors made by the students at second semester English Language Education at Islamic University of Batanghari were omission error occurs because student omits some important items that must appear in the sentence, addition error occurs because student gets failure to omit unimportant item in sentence, misformation error occurs because students use be and verb together in simple present sentence and misordering error occurs because students make the sentence has incorrect placement item and addition of preposition. And the dominant errors made by the students at second semester English Language Education at Islamic University of Batanghari is Omission error because from five 5 data itself consist of two topics of descriptive text students always make mistake in Omission error. It was possibly caused by carelessness of the students. The carelessness was often closely related to lack of motivation
Komparasi Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif:Kajian Sistematis Adang Ridwan; Saputra, Yoga Erdi; Karmila, Ria; Septiawan, Rian
Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juni:Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/concept.v5i2.2798

Abstract

The selection of appropriate data collection techniques and the development of valid research instruments are fundamental aspects that determine the quality and credibility of educational research. Differences in research paradigms between qualitative and quantitative approaches require distinct strategies for collecting data and designing research instruments. This study aims to compare data collection techniques and research instrument development in qualitative and quantitative research approaches through a systematic review. The study employed a systematic literature review method by analyzing relevant scientific publications, including journal articles, books, and conference proceedings published in the field of educational research. The collected literature was selected, evaluated, and synthesized based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify similarities, differences, strengths, and limitations of each approach. The findings indicate that qualitative research primarily employs interviews, observations, focus group discussions, and document analysis to obtain in-depth contextual data, while its research instruments include interview guides, observation protocols, field notes, and documentation guidelines that are developed flexibly according to research contexts. In contrast, quantitative research predominantly utilizes questionnaires, structured observations, tests, and experiments with standardized instruments that emphasize validity, reliability, and objectivity. The comparison further reveals that qualitative instrument development prioritizes credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability, whereas quantitative instrument development focuses on content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability testing. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of data collection techniques and research instrument development in both approaches, offering practical guidance for researchers in selecting appropriate methods based on research objectives and designs.
Co-Authors Adang Ridwan Ridwan, Adang Saputra, Yoga Erdi Septiawan, Rian