Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ecces: Economics, Social, and Development Studies ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies
Adhi Cahya Fahadayna
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Assessment Of Improvement Factors Violent Crimes In The United States Anas Puja Kesuma; Adhi Cahya Fahadayna
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 21 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/dialektika.v21i3.178

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the phenomenon violent crime which is increasingly becoming a prominent issue in the United States, where researchers are trying to see the relationship between factors such as the freedom to own firearms in the United States and social and economic disparities as factors that encourage individuals to commit violent crime, by seeking justification for individual behavior as rational action when viewed from that perspectiveRational Choice Theory. It was found that despite the high level of firearms ownership in the United States it greatly influences activityviolent crime andviolent crime which leads to death, researchers still cannot prove that external factors such as social and economic inequality have a major influence on the motivation of the United States population to commit suicide.violent crime. Researchers then provide recommendations regarding efforts to mitigate the negative impacts of the factors that have been explained, which are expected to contribute to good research that has been carried out, as well as future research. Keywords: Firearm Ownership, Social and Economic Disparities, Violent crime
Tunisian Fragile Democratization: Case of Democratic Backsliding during Kais Saied’s Presidency Ajeng Nadiya Husna Syahba; Adhi Cahya Fahadayna
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i1.849

Abstract

Tunisia is the only Arab country that has successfully carried out a revolution and democratization after the Arab Spring. However, this success cannot guarantee that democracy can survive and run well, especially in meeting the demands or expectations of the community. This paper aims to explain the decline of democracy during the Kais Saied administration after ten years of democracy implemented in Tunisia. This research uses Quantitative methods to explain the obstacles to the development of democracy. Multiple regression analysis techniques were used in this research to analyze the primary data: the Democracy Index by the Economic Intelligence Unit, Tunisia's GDP Growth (Annual) by the World Bank, and the Freedom of the World score by Freedom House to determine the influence of economic growth and the level of freedom on the decline of democracy in Tunisia. The study results show that economic growth and the level of freedom are interrelated with the prevailing government system. Aspects of political culture among the community and political elites influence the implementation of democracy. Democracy has not been able to be the key to overcoming challenges related to economic growth and high levels of corruption in Tunisia. The failure of political parties to carry out their duties and establish good relations with the community has hampered the development of democracy and encouraged the decline of the democratic regime in Tunisia through President Kais Saied's decision to dissolve parliament.
Comparative Study of Effectiveness Pronatalist Policies in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore 2015-2023 Mahira Sandria Rahmatiana; Adhi Cahya Fahadayna
HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/humanisma.v9i1.9235

Abstract

This study analyzed the impact of pronatalist policies on fertility rates in four Asian countries, consist of Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan during the period 2015-2023. Following a trend previously observed in Europe, these countries experienced a significant decline in fertility along with increasing economic activity in recent years. The selected timeframe reflects a period of active implementation of pronatalist policies since 2015. This research employs a comparative quantitative approach using multiple linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between policy variables and fertility rates. Secondary data are used, based on indicators derived from Sleebos’ (2003) framework, which includes financial incentives, child care, parental leave, family-friendly workplaces, welfare state, and tax systems. The findings, linear with previous study, indicate a positive and significant relationship between several pronatalist policies and fertility rates. This study focuses on mapping the current effectiveness of these policies in countries with similiar socio-economic contexts and highlights the complex interplay between policy design and each country’s unique social, cultural, and economic conditions.
The Effect of Democracy and Government Quality on the Level of Income Inequality In BRICS+ Members Athira Rasyadah Ningtias; Adhi Cahya Fahadayna; Muhammad Abdul Azis
EcceS: Economics, Social, and Development Studies Vol 12 No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Economics Department, Faculty of Economic and Islamic Business, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Income inequality remains a critical challenge in emerging economies, yet the mechanisms linking democracy and inequality in the BRICS+ bloc remain underexplored. This study investigates how democracy affects income inequality, with a specific focus on governance quality as a mediating factor, in ten BRICS+ countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, and Ethiopia) from 2013 to 2023. Its main contribution is introducing and empirically testing a mediation framework that positions governance as the critical intervening variable in this relationship, a novel approach in the context of this new economic bloc. Using robust panel estimation methods (FGLS, PCSE, and Driscoll-Kraay) to address cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity, the findings reveal a nuanced relationship. While democracy significantly improves governance quality, its effect on inequality is critically mediated by the type of governance dimension strengthened. Crucially, the study provides new empirical evidence that governance quality is a more decisive factor than democracy itself in shaping inequality outcomes within BRICS+. Key policy recommendations include prioritizing investments in primary education, ensuring political stability, and fostering transparent governance to effectively reduce economic disparities in the bloc.    
Democratic Recession and Illiberal Peacbuilding in Latin America: A Case Study of the Guyana- Venezuela Conflict Sadhya, Putri Callista; Adhi Cahya Fahadayna; Reza Triarda
ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : PT ARRUS Intelektual Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/soshum4772

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of the processes and dynamics of democratic regression, illiberal peacebuilding and path dependence in the?context of the Guyana-Venezuela territorial dispute for the Essequibo region. It was based on colonial era resentment, and has been worsened by the oil discovery - it speaks?to different but equally implacable forms of conflict resolution. Venezuela uses nationalist mobilization and autocratic means for domestic hegemony, while its partner Guyana resorts to technocratic legalism?in the form of international adjudication, all too often avoiding broad-based public participation. The analysis employs a qualitative comparative-historical analysis (CHA) within an HI approach to demonstrate how path?dependent institutional behavior influences state response to geopolitical disputes. The study makes comparisons to other international disputes, including Russia's forcible annexation of Crimea and China's construction works?in the South China Sea, with a view to illustrating how territorial conflicts can be exploited by illiberal regimes. The evidence indicates that procedural?democracy without participation and overt authoritarianism support the erosion of democratic governance. The article argues in favour of transparent, inclusive and?participatory peace-building approaches with regional organizations and impartial mediators. It maintains?that a sustainable solution to conflict must harmonize legal structures and democratic values when dealing with territorial disputes and domestic challenges to regime legitimacy in the Latin American context.
Co-Authors Ajeng Nadiya Husna Syahba Anas Puja Kesuma Athira Rasyadah Ningtias Mahira Sandria Rahmatiana Muhammad Abdul Azis Reza Triarda Sadhya, Putri Callista