Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mulawarman Law Review Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Wanda Anggraeni
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALYSIS OF THE FULFILLMENT OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN THE PROCESS OF ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA Nanda Yuniza Eviani; Wanda Anggraeni; Putri Patresia Ahmad
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v3i2.2893

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify the obstacles that impede the realization of political participation rights for individuals with disabilities during the electoral process in Indonesia, as well as potential solutions to these challenges. The normative and doctrinal research methods were utilized in this study. The materials were gathered through the utilization of both literature and field investigation. This research identifies at least three significant obstacles to the implementation of political participation rights for individuals with disabilities. Enforcement of laws and regulations and sociocultural factors are the issues. Potential remedies for these challenges include augmenting the enforcement of laws and regulations, as well as implementing social programs that benefit both the government and the community.
The Effectiveness of Supported Decision-Making in Election for Persons with Disabilities in Indonesia Juniar, Mutiah Wenda; Arini Nur Annisa; Ismail Iskandar; Nanda Yuniza; Wanda Anggraeni
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Mulawarman Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v9i2.1579

Abstract

This research objective is to determine the effectiveness of implementing supported decision-making (SDM) in elections for persons with disabilities in Indonesia. Thus, there are two research questions: how is the current implementation of supported decision-making in Indonesia, and second, what are the issues Indonesia has encountered in implementing Supported Decision-Making (SDM), and what are the strategies to implement SDM effectively to fulfill the political rights of persons with disabilities in Indonesia. The research method is qualitative; we interviewed several relevant stakeholders to obtain primary data and used relevant literature and reports to obtain secondary data. Thus, the result of the research shows that currently, Indonesia has implemented SDM, which is known as guardianship, specifically for persons with intellectual and mental disabilities during the elections. However, several issues hamper the implementation, such as the lack of understanding or awareness from the families and providers regarding SDM, lack of regulations, and the dilemma of autonomy and secrecy. Thus, there must be some strategies to implement effective SDM, such as providing specific regulations on providing reasonable accommodation for election, providing training for the providers on the election, open accessible information to the public and persons with disabilities regarding SDM, and collaboration with Disabilities Organization.
The Effectiveness of Supported Decision-Making in Election for Persons with Disabilities in Indonesia Juniar, Mutiah Wenda; Arini Nur Annisa; Ismail Iskandar; Nanda Yuniza; Wanda Anggraeni
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 9 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v9i2.1579

Abstract

This research objective is to determine the effectiveness of implementing supported decision-making (SDM) in elections for persons with disabilities in Indonesia. Thus, there are two research questions: how is the current implementation of supported decision-making in Indonesia, and second, what are the issues Indonesia has encountered in implementing Supported Decision-Making (SDM), and what are the strategies to implement SDM effectively to fulfill the political rights of persons with disabilities in Indonesia. The research method is qualitative; we interviewed several relevant stakeholders to obtain primary data and used relevant literature and reports to obtain secondary data. Thus, the result of the research shows that currently, Indonesia has implemented SDM, which is known as guardianship, specifically for persons with intellectual and mental disabilities during the elections. However, several issues hamper the implementation, such as the lack of understanding or awareness from the families and providers regarding SDM, lack of regulations, and the dilemma of autonomy and secrecy. Thus, there must be some strategies to implement effective SDM, such as providing specific regulations on providing reasonable accommodation for election, providing training for the providers on the election, open accessible information to the public and persons with disabilities regarding SDM, and collaboration with Disabilities Organization.
Co-Authors Arini Nur Annisa Ismail Iskandar Juniar, Mutiah Wenda Nanda Yuniza Nanda Yuniza Eviani Putri Patresia Ahmad