Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Minuta

Perbandingan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Antara Indonesia dan Belanda Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Christy, Lisya Jatasiri; Basyarahil, Ramzy Muhammad
JURNAL MINUTA Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/minuta.v7i2.7637

Abstract

The Constititional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 significantly changed the execution mechanism of fiduciary guarantess in Indonesia. Previously, creditors holding a Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate could directly execute the guarantee without a court ruling. Nevertheless, after the ruling, enforcement may proceed solely when the guaranteed asset is handed over willingly as a result of the debtor’s acceptance of their noncompliance. Otherwise, the creditor must seek court approval. This shift creates legal uncertainty and weakens the creditor’s legal standing. This paper addresses two main issues: (1) What are the impacts of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 in conjuction with Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 on creditor protection in fiduciary guarantees ? And (2) How does the post-decision guarantee system in Indonesia compare to the Dutch legal system, particularly in terms of creditor protection and execution procedures? The study examnines how the Constitutional Court’s rulling affects vreditors’ right while also considering the Dutch non-possessory (silent pledge) as a potential reference for legal reform. Since 1992, the Netherlands has replaced fiduciary guarantees with the silent pledge, a system that ensures creditor priority without requiring court involvement and offers stronger legal certainty. This model may serve as a viable solution to improve the fairness and effectiveness of fiduciary guarantee enforcement in Indonesia.
Unsur Sengaja pada Tanah Yang Tidak Dipergunakan Atau Dimanfaatkan dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Pertanahan Febrianto, Deddy; Putra, Prasta Rahandyanto; Basyarahil, Ramzy Muhammad; De Jesus, Marcello Alfarico; Harjo, David
JURNAL MINUTA Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/minuta.v7i2.7644

Abstract

Land plays a strategic role in Indonesia’s national development as both a livelihood and a constitutional mandate. However, the prevalence of abandoned land—over 99,099 hectares officially designated, and 854,662 hectares identified—raises critical legal concerns. Government Regulation No. 20 of 2021 on the Control of Abandoned Areas and Land aims to address this issue through administrative means yet introduces interpretative challenges surrounding the legal element of “intentionally” not utilizing land. This article examines the juridical interpretation of the “intent” requirement in determining whether land is deemed abandoned. The absence of a clear, objective definition of “intentionally” poses legal uncertainty and the risk of arbitrary state action that may infringe upon constitutionally protected land rights. Through normative juridical analysis, this study argues that the subjective nature of “intent” must be clarified by observable indicators, such as prolonged inaction, overgrown physical conditions, or documented administrative neglect. The research further highlights potential contradictions in implementation, including unequal treatment between state-held land and privately held plots. In conclusion, while abandoned land policies are essential for equitable agrarian reform, the state must ensure legal certainty, procedural safeguards, and proportional interpretation of "intent" to uphold agrarian justice and constitutional property rights. The paper recommends technical guidelines for determining intent and emphasizes the importance of due process before revoking land rights under the pretext of abandonment.