Sonya Claudia Siwu
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERBUATAN CABUL DALAM PERSPEKTIF TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL Rivaldo William Krisma Waruwu; Sonya Claudia Siwu; Michele Kristina
CALYPTRA Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (Mei)
Publisher : Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract—fornication is an obscene act which means any act that is contrary to the norms of decency or decency as long as it is included in the environment of genital lust. Cases of sexual abuse as a form of sexual violence are quite complex problems because the national commission against violence against women or the National Women's Commission in its annual records shows that the number of sexual violence against women is increasing. As time goes by changes in legislation modernize obscene acts into sexual violence in the form of physical sexual acts with the intention of degrading a person's honor and dignity based on sexuality as stipulated in Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Crimes of Sexual Violence. Proving the dehumanization of sexual objects is important in this study because the old provisions did not adopt this principle. This research shows that criminal liability for perpetrators of forced sexual acts on women's bodies is based on article 6 letter a of the Sexual Violence Crime Law. Keywords: sexual violence, degrading diginity, criminal liability Abstrak—percabulan merupakan perbuatan cabul yang memiliki pengertian segala perbuatan bertentangan dengan norma kesusilaan atau kesopanan selama termasuk dalam lingkungan birahi kelamin. Kasus pencabulan sebagai bentuk kekerasan seksual menjadi satu permasalahan yang cukup kompleks, sebab komisi nasional anti kekerasan terhadap perempuan atau komnas perempuan dalam catatan tahunannya menunjukan angka terjadinya kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuan semakin meningkat. seiring dengan berjalannya waktu perubahan perundang-undangan memoderenisasi perbuatan cabul menjadi kekerasan seksual berupa perbuatan seksual secara fisik dengan maksud merendahkan harkat dan martabat seseorang berdasarkan seksualitas sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Pembuktian atas dehumanisasi obyek seksual menjadi hal penting dalam kajian ini karena ketentuan lama tidak mengadopsi prinsip tersebut.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pelaku pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku pemaksaan perbuatan seksual terhadap fisik wanita adalah menggunakan pasal 6 huruf a Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Kata kunci: kekerasan seksual, merendahkan harkat dan martabat, pertanggungjawaban pidana
RATIO LEGIS RIGHTS MATERIAL TEST OF THE SUPREME COURT IN PERMA NUMBER 1 OF 2011 Sonya Claudia Siwu
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (121.347 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v4i1.247

Abstract

Judicial power is the last bastion in upholding the rule of law. The Supreme Court as one of the holders of judicial power in Indonesia is expressly specified in Article 24 A Paragraph (1) of the 1945 NRI Constitution has the authority to test the laws and regulations under the law. The authority of the Supreme Court is further regulated in Article 20 paragraph (2) letter (b) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning the Power of Justice; and Article 31 A of Law No. 3 of 2009 on The Second Amendment of Law No. 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court; and in Article 9 paragraph (2) of Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations (P3). Furthermore, to exercise its authority, the Supreme Court has enacted Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 1 of 2011 on Materil Test Rights. The Supreme Court's policy dictates that the trial is conducted behind closed doors with a limited time consideration of only 14 days while the case that goes to the Supreme Court is very much. In the development of the policy of carrying out the trial of material test rights behind closed doors drew criticism and rejection with arguments negating the sense of justice in the judicial environment. In this paper the authors try to look back at how PERMA Number 1 of 2011 was applied in a material test trial against the laws and regulations under the Act. The research method used in the discussion is to use the approach of norms, principles, theories, and concepts. In the end, the conclusion in this article is in order to realize justice, certainty and legal expediency and the independence and impartiality of judicial power in Indonesia as the last bastion of law enforcement, it is felt that changes are needed to PERMA No. 1 of 2011.