p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Prosedur Pendaftaran Tanah Adat Secara Sporadik dan Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Tanah Beritikad Baik Cornelia, Anita; Dewi Saraswati, Mutiara; Falyafil, Zakaria; Husein, Kamal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1628

Abstract

The implementation of land registration for the first time contained various problems, refer to State Administrative Court Decision Number 81/G/2012/PTUN-MDN jo. Decision of the High State Administrative Court Number 73/B/2013/PT.TUN-MDN jo. Supreme Court Decision Number 457K/TUN/2013 in conjunction with Supreme Court Decision Number 77 PK/TUN/2015, where the land belonging to Che'Dah is traditional Grant land used by Mario Lumban Tobing and sold to Christian Radjagukguk with the approval of Che'Dah, Christian Radjagukguk sold the house building to Saminah Br. Tampubalon, but the land has been issued a certificate of ownership rights number 327, Sukaraja sub-district by Datuk Syarial who obtained through conversion the recognition of rights and Datuk Syarial is the heir of the late Datuk Kamal. This research will find the answers to a problem, the type of research used is normative juridical which refers to laws and regulations that are passed and in force in Indonesia. The conclusion of this research is that the issuance of KTUN in the form of SHM Number 327/Sukaraja in the name of Datuk Syahrial is not in accordance with land registration procedures for the first time as stated in Article 12 paragraph (1) of GR Number 24 of 1997 and violates the GCG because it has harmed Norma Tampubalon as controller of the land acted in good faith. Ownership of land in good faith for 20 consecutive years is entitled to legal protection for sporadic land registration by unauthorized parties in the form of cancellation of SHM Number 327/Sukaraja. Cancellation of KTUN in the form of SHM can be done in 3 ways, namely requesting cancellation from the Minister of ATR/BPN through the Land Office, filing a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court (PTUN), or filing a lawsuit at the district court on the basis of an unlawful act.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN GB DAN PELAKU USAHA ATAS KERUGIAN KONSUMEN AKIBAT MENGKONSUMSI LAPCHIONG Putra Gunawan, Tri; Cornelia, Anita
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.616

Abstract

GB sebagai platform penyedia jasa layanan memiliki berbagai fitur yang dipergunakan untuk mempermudah hidup manusia. Salah satu fitur GB yang sering digunakan oleh konsumen dalam hal pemesanan makanan. Hal tersebut dikarenakan pemesanan makanan melalui GB memiliki berbagai keuntungan seperti menghemat waktu dan tenaga. Konsumen tidak perlu datang pada toko konvensional untuk mendapatkan makanan yang diinginkannya karena driver GB akan mengirimkan makanan sesuai dengan alamat yang diinginkan oleh konsumen. Lapchiong merupakan sosis keras berbahan dasar daging babi. Pelaku usaha lapchiong yang tidak mencantumkan keterangan tidak halal pada aplikasi GB mengakibatkan konsumen beragama Islam membeli dan mengkonsumsi lapchiong tersebut. Konsumen mengetahui bahwa lapchiong mengandung daging babi setelah konsumen tersebut mengkonsumsinya. Dalam Surat Al-Baqarah 173 terdapat larangan bagi Umat Islam untuk mengkonsumsi makanan yang mengandung daging babi. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis ingin mengetahui pihak yang bertanggung jawab akibat kerugian yang dialami oleh konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi makanan yang mengandung daging babi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah sah dan berlaku di Indonesia dan dikaitkan dengan kasus yang terjadi.
Prosedur Pendaftaran Tanah Adat Secara Sporadik dan Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Tanah Beritikad Baik Cornelia, Anita; Dewi Saraswati, Mutiara; Falyafil, Zakaria; Husein, Kamal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1628

Abstract

The implementation of land registration for the first time contained various problems, refer to State Administrative Court Decision Number 81/G/2012/PTUN-MDN jo. Decision of the High State Administrative Court Number 73/B/2013/PT.TUN-MDN jo. Supreme Court Decision Number 457K/TUN/2013 in conjunction with Supreme Court Decision Number 77 PK/TUN/2015, where the land belonging to Che'Dah is traditional Grant land used by Mario Lumban Tobing and sold to Christian Radjagukguk with the approval of Che'Dah, Christian Radjagukguk sold the house building to Saminah Br. Tampubalon, but the land has been issued a certificate of ownership rights number 327, Sukaraja sub-district by Datuk Syarial who obtained through conversion the recognition of rights and Datuk Syarial is the heir of the late Datuk Kamal. This research will find the answers to a problem, the type of research used is normative juridical which refers to laws and regulations that are passed and in force in Indonesia. The conclusion of this research is that the issuance of KTUN in the form of SHM Number 327/Sukaraja in the name of Datuk Syahrial is not in accordance with land registration procedures for the first time as stated in Article 12 paragraph (1) of GR Number 24 of 1997 and violates the GCG because it has harmed Norma Tampubalon as controller of the land acted in good faith. Ownership of land in good faith for 20 consecutive years is entitled to legal protection for sporadic land registration by unauthorized parties in the form of cancellation of SHM Number 327/Sukaraja. Cancellation of KTUN in the form of SHM can be done in 3 ways, namely requesting cancellation from the Minister of ATR/BPN through the Land Office, filing a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court (PTUN), or filing a lawsuit at the district court on the basis of an unlawful act.