Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Christian Orey Singal, Laurentius Kevin
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembagian Wilayah PPAT oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Kota Surabaya Berkaitan dengan PP No. 37 Tahun 1998 Camelia Parameswari, Rayfa; Christian Orey Singal, Laurentius Kevin; Christianti Supardi, Septia Angelin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1738

Abstract

BPN has partners to help carry out its duties and functions, one of which is PPAT, which is a public official who is given the authority to make authentic deeds regarding land rights, which has a working area that has different rules in Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 which regulates PPAT's working area is one provincial area, whereas in Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency Number 1 of 2006 it is one working area of the Land Office. This resulted in losses for the PPAT that forced to follow the BPN. This writing was carried out using the Statute Approach and Conceptual Approach, which aims to obtain legal certainty regarding the PPAT work area that should be followed. From the discussion, it can be seen that the source of BPN's authority to divide the PPAT area is based on the Head of Land Agency Regulation Number 1 of 2006 which regulates the work area of PPAT which follows the land office, and that the legal relationship between PPAT and BPN is specifically in the scope of the transfer of land rights is a horizontal legal relationship (mitra) so it should not be appropriate for one institution to impose its will which is contrary to the applicable laws and regulations
Pembagian Wilayah PPAT oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Kota Surabaya Berkaitan dengan PP No. 37 Tahun 1998 Camelia Parameswari, Rayfa; Christian Orey Singal, Laurentius Kevin; Christianti Supardi, Septia Angelin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1738

Abstract

BPN has partners to help carry out its duties and functions, one of which is PPAT, which is a public official who is given the authority to make authentic deeds regarding land rights, which has a working area that has different rules in Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 which regulates PPAT's working area is one provincial area, whereas in Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency Number 1 of 2006 it is one working area of the Land Office. This resulted in losses for the PPAT that forced to follow the BPN. This writing was carried out using the Statute Approach and Conceptual Approach, which aims to obtain legal certainty regarding the PPAT work area that should be followed. From the discussion, it can be seen that the source of BPN's authority to divide the PPAT area is based on the Head of Land Agency Regulation Number 1 of 2006 which regulates the work area of PPAT which follows the land office, and that the legal relationship between PPAT and BPN is specifically in the scope of the transfer of land rights is a horizontal legal relationship (mitra) so it should not be appropriate for one institution to impose its will which is contrary to the applicable laws and regulations
Co-Authors Camelia Parameswari, Rayfa Christianti Supardi, Septia Angelin