Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) LEGAL BRIEF Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial
Yenni Yunithawati Rukmana
Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Protection for Buyers Against Cancellation of The Certificate of Land Rights Due to Administrative Defects Ramadani, Moch Januar; Pujiwati, Yani; Rukmana, Yenni Yunithawati
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Government Policy and Its Implementation to Maintain the Stability of the Nation
Publisher : Department of Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v6i2.44030

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the position of land rights certificates which were canceled by BPN due to administrative defects related to the status of land rights and legal protection for buyer. This research makes use of a normative juridical approach as its methodology. In this research, it is stated that Land Rights established on Management Rights and then transferred to third parties/buyers without permission from the Management Rights holder can be categorized as genuine but fake certificates (asphalt), so that such certificates are declared administratively defective and must be cancelled. Regarding protection for buyers whose certificates are later cancelled, legal protection can be implemented repressively, namely by the buyer getting compensation for the canceled certificate which should be the buyer's right.
IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESIDENTIAL REGULATION NUMBER 13 OF 2018 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RECOGNIZING CORPORATION BENEFICIAL OWNERS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING IN CONNECTION W Andi Yudistira; Ratna Januarita; Yenni Yunithawati Rukmana
Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Vol. 2 No. 2 Edisi April 2025
Publisher : PT. Jurnal Center Indonesia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62567/micjo.v2i2.774

Abstract

Beneficial Owner or beneficial owner in Presidential Decree Number 13 of 2018, explained as holder power and authority the highest one has control full towards the Corporation as a GMS. Based on his rights as regulated​ in Presidential Decree Number 13 of 2018 , Beneficial Owners have​ equal standing​ with Major Shareholders who have shares , rights sound and get profit more of the 25% where has exceeding the ownership limit share holder share main namely at least 20% in the company . Corporations are often used as tool somebody For avoid not quite enough answer disclosure origin treasure riches as well as use assets . Misuse ownership benefit can harm holder share minorities , employees , creditors , and lead to crime businesses that are detrimental to the country, such as act criminal corruption , crime criminal money laundering , crime criminal funding terrorism , and others . The role of notaries in recognize Owner Sorry in Corporations , have obligation For to apply principle recognize Owner Benefits done through identification , verification and monitoring towards the Corporation as user service as regulated​ in Presidential Decree Number 13 of 2018 and Perkumham Number 15 of 2019. However , in reality matter the Not yet can implemented in a way maximum because of its complexity structure ownership in a Corporation and No existence clarity position about Beneficial Owner or beneficial owner in UUPT, apart from That Still many Corporations as user services that are still Not yet cooperative in give information related The Beneficial Owner is the real . Vacancy law related position Beneficial Owner or beneficial owner in a Corporation because Still Not yet there is arrangement legislation that regulates in a way clear and specific .
Analysis of the Partiality in Legal Counseling by Notaries During Extraor-dinary General Meetings of Shareholders Based on the Principle of Justice Nurjannah, Mira; Gultom, Elisatris; Rukmana, Yenni Yunithawati
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i4.1107

Abstract

One of the notary's authorities is to provide legal counseling, including in the context of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS). This counseling is very important to ensure the legality of the legal process, especially in the preparation of deeds related to the transfer of shares and other important decisions. However, in practice, there are cases where notaries do not perform their duties independently, which ultimately leads to legal problems. As a country of law, Indonesia guarantees legal certainty and protection for every citizen. However, irregularities by less independent notaries, such as in the case of Notary Hartono in Gianyar Regency, highlight significant risks for the parties involved, including potential losses due to falsification of documents. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of deeds produced by non-independent notaries. This study seeks to explore how non-compliance by notaries with this principle affects the validity of the deeds they produce. The method used in this study is a normative juridical approach that utilizes secondary data, with analysis carried out on relevant laws and regulations, documents, and literature related to the authority of notaries and the principle of justice. This research is descriptive-analytical, providing an overview of the consequences arising from the lack of independence in the duties of notaries, followed by analysis. The results of the study show that the lack of independence of notaries in providing legal counseling can cause legally defective deeds and potentially void them, resulting in losses for the affected parties. The case of Notary Hartono serves as a concrete example where violations of notary independence lead to forgery of deeds and significant legal repercussions. The principle of justice is not upheld if the notary does not act independently in carrying out his duties
Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Kerugian yang Timbul Akibat Praktik Pembuatan PPJB yang Tidak Sesuai UUJN Nafisha, Riskava Zahra; Abubakar, Lastuti; Rukmana, Yenni Yunithawati
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15250

Abstract

Pengikatan jual beli merupakan bentuk perjanjian yang muncul dari kebutuhan hukum yang berkembang dalam masyarakat. Pengikatan jual beli tanah merupakan perjanjian tidak bernama, karena tidak ditemukan dalam bentuk-bentuk perjanjian yang diatur dalam KUHPerdata. Akta PPJB yang dibuat dihadapan notaris dibatalkan apabila tidak memenuhi unsur subyektif atau batal demi hukum apabila tidak memenuhi unsur objektif. Akta PPJB yang dibuat dengan cara demikian dapat dinyatakan batal demi hukum, seolah-olah akta tersebut tidak pernah ada. Pihak-pihak yang dirugikan akibat batalnya akta tersebut berhak meminta pertanggungjawaban dari notaris dalam bentuk ganti rugi. Berdasarkan kesimpulan di atas, penulis ingin menyarankan agar notaris lebih berhati-hati dalam menjalankan tugasnya, terutama dalam merumuskan akta. Notaris harus lebih teliti, memberikan edukasi yang jelas kepada para pihak, dan menjaga netralitas tanpa memihak. Dengan cara ini, notaris dapat menghindari tuntutan hukum di masa mendatang akibat kelalaian dalam pembuatan akta.
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM NOTARIS DAN PPAT ATAS PENGGELAPAN BPHTB OLEH KARYAWAN DALAM AKTA JUAL BELI Jiman; Nandang Sambas; Yenni Yunithawati Rukmana
SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Juli-Desember 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71456/sultan.v4i2.2416

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji tanggung jawab hukum Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) terhadap perbuatan karyawan yang melakukan penggelapan dana Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) dalam proses pembuatan akta jual beli. Permasalahan ini muncul karena dalam praktik para pihak sering menitipkan pengurusan pembayaran BPHTB kepada kantor Notaris/PPAT demi efisiensi, sementara pemenuhan kewajiban pembayaran BPHTB merupakan syarat penting sebelum akta ditandatangani dan peralihan hak dapat didaftarkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tanggung jawab Notaris dan PPAT tidak bersifat otomatis. Tanggung jawab perdata dapat timbul apabila terdapat kelalaian pengawasan atau hubungan kausal antara sistem pengelolaan kantor dengan kerugian klien, terutama berdasarkan prinsip perbuatan melawan hukum dan vicarious liability. Tanggung jawab pidana pada prinsipnya melekat pada karyawan sebagai pelaku langsung; Notaris/PPAT hanya dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana apabila terbukti terdapat keterlibatan, perintah, penyertaan, atau pembiaran yang disengaja. Secara administratif, sanksi dapat dikenakan apabila Notaris/PPAT tidak menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian, verifikasi, dan pengawasan profesional. Penyelesaian hukum dapat ditempuh melalui jalur perdata, pidana, dan administratif yang berjalan paralel, sementara restorative justice dapat dipertimbangkan secara terbatas dengan orientasi pemulihan kerugian. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan pengawasan internal, verifikasi pembayaran BPHTB yang terdokumentasi, serta penggunaan sistem pembayaran transparan untuk menjaga kepastian hukum dan kepercayaan publik.
Co-Authors Andi Yudistira Elisatris Gultom Jiman Lastuti Abubakar Nafisha, Riskava Zahra Nandang Sambas Nurjannah, Mira Ramadani, Moch Januar Ratna Januarita Yani Pujiwati