Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Efektivitas Dalam Pengelolaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Yang Mengalami Overcrowded di Negara Indonesia dan Brasil Rizki Pratama, Muh Ersandi; Ansa, Ferdi; Irfandi, Fitra; Hafiidz Syam, Syahrul
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1894

Abstract

Indonesia is a country based on law. In addition to using the term rechtstaat, Indonesian literature also commonly uses another term, namely the rule of law, to mean "rule of law". This coaching system is implemented by Correctional Institutions or what is abbreviated as Lapas as regulated in Article 6 of Law Number 12 of 1995. Correctional Institutions must organize correctional institutions so that prisoners can be accepted back into society. The performance of a prison in implementing correctional services is greatly influenced by several factors, namely the quantity and quality of prison officers, adequate facilities and infrastructure, a coaching program that is tailored to interests and talents, and the existence of comparability. These factors complement each other. The method used in compiling this research is research with a normative juridical method approach, namely research that focuses on testing the application of rules or norms in law. The effectiveness of the management of overcrowded prisons in Indonesia and Brazil is very good. In Indonesia, which has made efforts to prevent overcrowding by using several alternative methods, such as a grand design for handling overcrowding in state detention centers and correctional institutions, there is institutional strengthening in correctional institutions. Brazil has made efforts to prevent overcrowding by privatizing correctional institutions and outsourcing.
Comparison of Laws Related to the Copyright of Visual Artworks Based on Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) Reviewed from Indonesian and UK Laws Rizki Pratama, Muh Ersandi; Hafiidz Syam, Syahrul
RechtIdee Vol 19, No 1 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v19i1.24265

Abstract

AI has demonstrated its limitless potential in bringing innovation and increasing efficiency. However, this raises new problems regarding the status of Generative AI-based works of art, where the work is the result of data processing from AI technology. The way AI works, which uses creations as input data to produce music, articles and paintings, can open up the potential for rights violations. copyright because its exclusive use is protected from being duplicated or used for profit (commercial) and raises a question regarding the ownership status of Generative AI-based painting works of art. Another consideration in providing ownership status protection for Generative AI-based works of art is the possibility of copyright infringement. The method used in compiling this research is research with a normative juridical method approach. The approaches used are the conceptual approach, comparative approach and statutory approach. Authenticity is very important in copyright protection. In Indonesia, copyright protection is regulated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, article 1 numbers 1 and 2 do not clearly explain the authenticity of a work, from the definition of the creator and creation, there are elements that become limitations or benchmarks, namely elements independent creation (independent creation). CDPA 1988, or the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, is the copyright law applicable in the United Kingdom. This law is an important legal framework for copyright protection in the country. The 1988 CDPA provides copyright protection for created works, this Act further defines computer-generated works.
Perbandingan Efektivitas Dalam Pengelolaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Yang Mengalami Overcrowded di Negara Indonesia dan Brasil Rizki Pratama, Muh Ersandi; Ansa, Ferdi; Irfandi, Fitra; Hafiidz Syam, Syahrul
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1894

Abstract

Indonesia is a country based on law. In addition to using the term rechtstaat, Indonesian literature also commonly uses another term, namely the rule of law, to mean "rule of law". This coaching system is implemented by Correctional Institutions or what is abbreviated as Lapas as regulated in Article 6 of Law Number 12 of 1995. Correctional Institutions must organize correctional institutions so that prisoners can be accepted back into society. The performance of a prison in implementing correctional services is greatly influenced by several factors, namely the quantity and quality of prison officers, adequate facilities and infrastructure, a coaching program that is tailored to interests and talents, and the existence of comparability. These factors complement each other. The method used in compiling this research is research with a normative juridical method approach, namely research that focuses on testing the application of rules or norms in law. The effectiveness of the management of overcrowded prisons in Indonesia and Brazil is very good. In Indonesia, which has made efforts to prevent overcrowding by using several alternative methods, such as a grand design for handling overcrowding in state detention centers and correctional institutions, there is institutional strengthening in correctional institutions. Brazil has made efforts to prevent overcrowding by privatizing correctional institutions and outsourcing.