Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Kewarganegaraan
Namira Diffany Nuzan
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menangani Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum 2024 Christine S.T Kansil; Namira Diffany Nuzan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2038

Abstract

The writing of this research is based on the aim that an assessment will be carried out regarding the extent of the authority of the constitutional court in handling the 2024 election dispute case submitted by the presidential candidate pair and also the vice presidential candidate in serial number 3 and serial number 1. The basis for submitting the petition to the constitutional court by of the candidate pair that there are indications that there was a massive structured and systematic act of fraud in the 2024 election carried out by presidential and vice presidential candidate number 2 where in the implementation of this year's election the principles of fairness and overflow were not implemented properly. Therefore, a problem that can be studied is whether the constitutional court has the authority to handle this case, as in accordance with Law Number 24 of 2003 which regulates the authority of the constitutional court in Article 10 paragraph 1 letter a. Therefore, in the implementation or results of this research, the author really hopes that it will be useful for the constitutional court and the parties involved in this matter. Apart from that, readers will also be able to find out about the extent of authority that the constitutional court has in handling disputes over election results.
Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menangani Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum 2024 Christine S.T Kansil; Namira Diffany Nuzan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2038

Abstract

The writing of this research is based on the aim that an assessment will be carried out regarding the extent of the authority of the constitutional court in handling the 2024 election dispute case submitted by the presidential candidate pair and also the vice presidential candidate in serial number 3 and serial number 1. The basis for submitting the petition to the constitutional court by of the candidate pair that there are indications that there was a massive structured and systematic act of fraud in the 2024 election carried out by presidential and vice presidential candidate number 2 where in the implementation of this year's election the principles of fairness and overflow were not implemented properly. Therefore, a problem that can be studied is whether the constitutional court has the authority to handle this case, as in accordance with Law Number 24 of 2003 which regulates the authority of the constitutional court in Article 10 paragraph 1 letter a. Therefore, in the implementation or results of this research, the author really hopes that it will be useful for the constitutional court and the parties involved in this matter. Apart from that, readers will also be able to find out about the extent of authority that the constitutional court has in handling disputes over election results.
Menelaah Lebih Dalam Perbedaan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi Namira Diffany Nuzan; Fernanda Naulisa Situmorang; Kaniko Dyon Geraldi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6418

Abstract

Abstrak Artikel ini membahas lebih dalam perbedaan antara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dengan tindakan Wanprestasi dalam Hukum Perdata. Tujuan penelitian ini sendiri adalah untuk memberikan wawasan kepada pembaca mengenai pengertian Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi serta menjelaskan apa saja aspek yang membedakan antara kedua hal tersebut. Oleh karenanya, untuk memperoleh data yang valid, Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dimana penelitian ini dilakukan dengan melakukan riset terhadap bahan hukum baik itu bahan pustaka primer maupun sekunder. Adapun rumusan masalah yang kami teliti dalam artikel ini yaitu Apa yang saja unsur-unsur Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi serta Apa perbedaan mendasar mengenai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi itu sendiri. Dalam penelitian ini, kami merumuskan bahwa terdapat beberapa unsur-unsur dari Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dengan Wanprestasi yang menjadikan kedua tindakan tersebut menjadi berbeda seperti Kata Kunci: Perbedaan, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Wanprestasi Abstract This article discusses in more depth the differences between Unlawful Acts and Wanprestasi. The reason for this consideration is to provide understanding to readers regarding the meaning of Unlawful Acts and Wanprestasi and to explain what differentiate between the two. Therefore, to obtain valid information, the Creator uses a normative research method where this research is conducted by conducting inquiries about legitimate materials, both primary and secondary library materials. The definition of the issue that we examine in this article is What are the components of Unlawful Acts and Wanprestasi as well as What are the fundamental differences between Unlawful Acts and Wanprestasi themselves. In this research, we define that there are a few components of Unlawful Acts and Wanprestasi that make the two activities different, such as their meaning and actions. Keywords: Different, Unlawful Acts, Wanprestasi
Co-Authors Christine S.T Kansil Fernanda Naulisa Situmorang Kaniko Dyon Geraldi