Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review
Kansil, Christine S.T
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika Kansil, Christine S.T; Putri Meilika Nadilatasya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2039

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is one of the judicial power institutions appointed to carry out judicial functions to uphold the law and justice as fair as possible. According to Law Number 24 of 2003, the Constitutional Court has the duty and function to handle constitutional cases relating to certain constitutional issues. To ensure that the constitution is implemented responsibly in accordance with the will of the people and the principles of democracy, constitutional judges must have knowledge and skills in state administration as well as a commitment to implement and oversee public life. The Constitutional Court's decision on the age limit of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections (Election Law) is considered a measure of the qualifications of a leader, and this decision has caused much debate in society. The purpose of this research is to identify how the Constitutional Court's decision impacts Indonesian politics as well as the ethical standards violated by the judges when making the decision.
Review Of The Intellectual Property Directorate General's Responsibility Regarding The Cancellation Of Well-Known Trademark Registration In The Same Class Of Goods Laffaiza, Nasywa; Kansil, Christine S.T
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v10i1.22274

Abstract

The responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI) in canceling the registration of famous trademarks in the same class of goods is an important issue in the protection of intellectual property rights in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the authority of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) in canceling the registration of well-known trademarks that are deemed to harm the owners of well-known trademarks, especially when the newly registered trademark is in the same class of goods. This review examines the responsibilities and authorities of DJKI based on regulations governing trademark cancellation, such as Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, as well as decisions issued by DJKI related to trademark cancellation. This research also discusses the factors that influence DJKI's decisions in assessing whether a brand can be considered famous and whether the registration of a new brand can pose a risk of confusion in the market. The analysis results show that DJKI has a significant responsibility in maintaining the integrity of the trademark registration system and protecting the rights of famous trademark owners. This research provides recommendations on the importance of stricter supervision and law enforcement to ensure that famous brands are optimally protected from misuse and intellectual property rights violations in Indonesia
Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika Kansil, Christine S.T; Putri Meilika Nadilatasya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2039

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is one of the judicial power institutions appointed to carry out judicial functions to uphold the law and justice as fair as possible. According to Law Number 24 of 2003, the Constitutional Court has the duty and function to handle constitutional cases relating to certain constitutional issues. To ensure that the constitution is implemented responsibly in accordance with the will of the people and the principles of democracy, constitutional judges must have knowledge and skills in state administration as well as a commitment to implement and oversee public life. The Constitutional Court's decision on the age limit of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections (Election Law) is considered a measure of the qualifications of a leader, and this decision has caused much debate in society. The purpose of this research is to identify how the Constitutional Court's decision impacts Indonesian politics as well as the ethical standards violated by the judges when making the decision.
Co-Authors Laffaiza, Nasywa Putri Meilika Nadilatasya