Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Anggia Rettrisunz P I M Panjaitan
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Prosedur dan Efektifitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan dan Investasi Dalam Asean Anggia Rettrisunz P I M Panjaitan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2097

Abstract

The Association of South-East Asian Nations Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism (ASEAN EDSM), like the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Dispute Settlement Mechanism, recognizes trade countermeasures in the event of noncompliance with Panel and Appellate Body rulings. However, the harmed party may encounter stumbling obstacles while proposing an authorized trade countermeasure. The pitfall emphasizes the implications of not resolving the conflict. Meanwhile, ASEAN acknowledges a system that allows disputant states to present outstanding disputes to the ASEAN Summit under Article 26 of the ASEAN Charter. Furthermore, if the injured party is harmed as a result of the ASEAN dispute settlement decision's failure to be implemented, the injured party may raise the issue at the ASEAN Summit in accordance with Article 27(2) of the ASEAN Charter. This study looks into whether the involvement of the ASEAN Summit may help solve the post-adjudication problem in the ASEAN EDSM. The research methods include a literature review and a thorough reading of Articles 26 and 27 of the ASEAN Charter
Prosedur dan Efektifitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan dan Investasi Dalam Asean Anggia Rettrisunz P I M Panjaitan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2097

Abstract

The Association of South-East Asian Nations Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism (ASEAN EDSM), like the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Dispute Settlement Mechanism, recognizes trade countermeasures in the event of noncompliance with Panel and Appellate Body rulings. However, the harmed party may encounter stumbling obstacles while proposing an authorized trade countermeasure. The pitfall emphasizes the implications of not resolving the conflict. Meanwhile, ASEAN acknowledges a system that allows disputant states to present outstanding disputes to the ASEAN Summit under Article 26 of the ASEAN Charter. Furthermore, if the injured party is harmed as a result of the ASEAN dispute settlement decision's failure to be implemented, the injured party may raise the issue at the ASEAN Summit in accordance with Article 27(2) of the ASEAN Charter. This study looks into whether the involvement of the ASEAN Summit may help solve the post-adjudication problem in the ASEAN EDSM. The research methods include a literature review and a thorough reading of Articles 26 and 27 of the ASEAN Charter
Co-Authors