Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Aurelia Rahim, Tsabita
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan dan Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Artificial Intelegence Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia Hardiyanti Qurrahman, Shofika; Ayunil, Safira; Aurelia Rahim, Tsabita
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2108

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, or better known as AI, in a technological era like this, is developing very rapidly. AI was created and designed to hamper the human brain, digging information, providing information, even solving problems. With AI designed just like humans, when AI commits an act against the law and causes loss, then AI cannot be brought to criminal responsibility. AI can not commit an offence independently, in its operation requires human help. In positive law in Indonesia, AI is not a legal subject like human beings and legal bodies that are jurisprudently recognized as legal subjects.
Kedudukan dan Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Artificial Intelegence Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia Hardiyanti Qurrahman, Shofika; Ayunil, Safira; Aurelia Rahim, Tsabita
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2108

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, or better known as AI, in a technological era like this, is developing very rapidly. AI was created and designed to hamper the human brain, digging information, providing information, even solving problems. With AI designed just like humans, when AI commits an act against the law and causes loss, then AI cannot be brought to criminal responsibility. AI can not commit an offence independently, in its operation requires human help. In positive law in Indonesia, AI is not a legal subject like human beings and legal bodies that are jurisprudently recognized as legal subjects.
Co-Authors Ayunil, Safira Hardiyanti Qurrahman, Shofika