Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan
Nawa, Fridolin
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Publikasi Konten Politik pada Masa Tenang Kampanye Pemilu: Tindak Pidana Pemilu atau Kebebasan Berekspresi? Nawa, Fridolin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2154

Abstract

The legal framework Election in Indonesia regulates the methods and campaign periods allowed for electoral participants. The election campaigns are supposed to end at the start of election campaign’s quiet period. However, due to the evolution of campaign methods, particularly through the internet, there are still instances where advertisements and social media content related to electoral participants, whether by the participants themselves or others, continue to be circulated. Therefore, standards for conducting election campaigns must be fairly regulated. This article discusses the intersection between freedom of expression and elction crime during the quiet period, examining the stipulations of the Indonesia Election Law. Research reveals that the current regulations are ambiguous, leading to ongoing debates in election law enforcement. Campaign activities during the quiet period contradict electoral laws and may result in penalties ranging from administrative to criminal sanctions.
Due Process in a Search of Electronic System by Patrol Officer Nawa, Fridolin; Veronica, Shierren; Samudra, Anton Hendrik; Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah
JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol. 25 No. 02 (2022): Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/yustika.v25i02.5338

Abstract

The criminal justice system provides the legal framework for a fair and justifiable search. A search is justifiable when there is a search warrant or strong suspicion of crime by the police. However, instances of coercion and arbitrary acts by law enforcement officers still occur in practice, as seen in the case portrayed in East Jakarta. While this case does not represent the behaviour of all law enforcement officers, the standard for a fair search must be enforced. This article discusses the legal procedures for conducting a justifiable search of electronic systems suspected to be a tool of crime and evaluates whether such a search would violate the right to privacy. The article provides an academic discussion and evaluation of criminal law procedures in practice, using doctrinal research to scrutinize the provisions within the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (EITL), Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), and Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) to determine the parameters of a justifiable search of an electronic system that conforms to the due process of law. Additionally, a comparison between the PDPL and the UK GDPR, as well as the 2018 Data Protection Act, was conducted to evaluate the privacy provisions in a search activity by law enforcement officers. The research finds that not every patrol officer has the justified measures to conduct a search on an alleged person, unless there is enough probable cause as stipulated in the CPL. Searches of civilian cell phones that are not in accordance with CPL, EITL, and PDPL should be considered illegal, and the officer who conducts them should be held accountable, both legally and ethically.
Publikasi Konten Politik pada Masa Tenang Kampanye Pemilu: Tindak Pidana Pemilu atau Kebebasan Berekspresi? Nawa, Fridolin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2154

Abstract

The legal framework Election in Indonesia regulates the methods and campaign periods allowed for electoral participants. The election campaigns are supposed to end at the start of election campaign’s quiet period. However, due to the evolution of campaign methods, particularly through the internet, there are still instances where advertisements and social media content related to electoral participants, whether by the participants themselves or others, continue to be circulated. Therefore, standards for conducting election campaigns must be fairly regulated. This article discusses the intersection between freedom of expression and elction crime during the quiet period, examining the stipulations of the Indonesia Election Law. Research reveals that the current regulations are ambiguous, leading to ongoing debates in election law enforcement. Campaign activities during the quiet period contradict electoral laws and may result in penalties ranging from administrative to criminal sanctions.
Co-Authors Anton Hendrik Samudra Veronica, Shierren