Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Kontemplasi : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin
Basayif, Muhammad Syamil
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics and His Contribution to The Study of Hadith Basayif, Muhammad Syamil; Amanullah, Mahasin Haikal; Amal, M. Khusna
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v8i2.8434

Abstract

Contemporary hadith studies have involved many auxiliary sciences, one of which is hermeneutics. As a critical theory, hermeneutics has been utilized by hadith scholars to explore the meanings of hadith not only on the denotative but also on the connotative level. One of the hermeneutical theories that is worth considering and has not been widely used by scholars to read hadith texts is Schleiermacher's objective hermeneutics. Broadly speaking, the main ideas of objective hermeneutics emphasize grammatical interpretation, psychological interpretation, the hermeneutical circle, and the method of divination. Using library research, this study aims to examine the involvement of objective hermeneutics in the study of hadith which some scholars believe is not relevant enough. The results of the study show that the use of objective hermeneutics proves to be relevant and even contributes importantly to revealing the historical (asbabul wurud), epistemological (ulum al-hadis), and interpretive (syarh al-hadis) dimensions. Grammatical interpretation serves to explore ḥadīś textually, psychological interpretation aims to read the context when the ḥadīś appeared, the divination method serves to record the main ideas of the author, the hermeneutic circle is useful to dialogue between text and context until contextualization is born. Thus, Schleiermacher's hermeneutics makes an important contribution to hadith discourse in the modern era, without being uprooted from the roots of classical hadith discourse.
Relevansi Semiotika Dan Uṣhūl Fiqh: Telaah Atas Hadis-Hadis Aḥkām Basayif, Muhammad Syamil
Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 12 No 02 (2024): Jurnal Kontemplasi
Publisher : UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/kontem.2024.12.02.215-238

Abstract

Abstract The integration of semiotics as a modern analytical tool into the classical Islamic sciences is often limited to the discourse of ‘ulūm al-Qur'ān and ’ulūm al-hadīs. The themes discussed are only dominated by ethical discussions. However, uṣhūl fiqh plays an important role in analysing naṣ that relate to the jurisprudential-practical dimension. This article is a literature review that seeks to explore the relevance between Ferdinand de Saussure's semiotics and classical uṣhūl fiqh theory. The focus is on examining hadīths that contain legal-formal laws (hadīś ahkām). The question in this study is how the relevance between the two and how semiotics is implemented as a basis for the production of fiqh law (istinbāt al-ahkām). The main argument is that contemporary scientific paradigms do not necessarily contradict classical Islamic knowledge. However, differences in terminology and function are often considered as a gap between the two poles. The relevance of both appears especially in the concept of sign systems. This can be seen in how the uṣhūlīs assign new sign systems such as amr meaning obligatory and nahy meaning forbidden to naṣṣ. Integrating semiotics into uṣhūl fiqh will provide a new nuance in the treasury of Islamic knowledge. Keywords: Ferdinand de Saussure semiotics, Uṣhūl Fiqh, hadith ahkām. Abstrak Usaha mengintegrasikan semiotika sebagai pisau analisis modern ke dalam khazanah ilmu keislaman klasik kerap kali hanya berkutat pada diskursus ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān dan ‘ulūm al-hadīs. Tema yang dibicarakan pun hanya didominasi diskusi tataran dalam etis. Padahal selain keduanya, terdapat pula uṣhūl fiqh yang berperan penting dalam menganalisa naṣṣ yang berkaitan dengan dimensi yurisprudis–praksis. Artikel ini adalah kajian pustaka yang berusaha menelusuri relevansi antara semiotika Ferdinand de Saussure dengan teori uṣhūl fiqh klasik. Fokusnya adalah meneliti hadis-hadis yang bermuatan hukum legal-formal (hadīś ahkām). Pertanyaan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana relevansi antara keduanya dan bagaimana semiotika diimplementasikan sebagai basis produksi hukum fikih (istinbāt al-ahkām). Argumen utamanya adalah bahwa tidak selamanya paradigma keilmuan kontemporer bertentangan dengan khazanah ilmu keislaman klasik. Hanya saja, perbedaan terminologi dan fungsi kerap kali dianggap sebagai jurang pemisah antara dua kutub tersebut. Relevansi keduanya nampak terutama dalam konsep sistem tanda. Hal ini bisa dilihat dari bagaimana para uṣhūlī memberikan sistem tanda baru seperti amr bermakna wajib dan nahy bermakna haram ke dalam naṣṣ. Mengintegrasikan semiotika ke dalam uṣhūl fiqh akan memberikan nuansa baru dalam khazanah ilmu Keislaman.
Co-Authors Amanullah, Mahasin Haikal M. Khusna Amal