Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Elektro : Journal of Electrical Power, Informatics, Telecommunication, Electronics, Computer and Control System
Say, Marinus Moang Laurentius
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
EVALUASI RESISTANSI SENSITIVITAS MODUL GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE BERBASIS ARDUINO NANO Rachmat, Hendi Handian; Say, Marinus Moang Laurentius
Jurnal Media Elektro Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Oktober 2023
Publisher : Universitas Nusa Cendana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/jme.v12i2.11809

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity of a Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sensor to measure human stress levels based on skin conductivity of two fingers. The goal of this evaluation was to define the optimum sensitivity resistance of the Wheatstone bridge circuit in the GSR sensor to detect six different levels of human stress conditions, ranging from Normal level (0–0.415μSiemens) to Severe level (>4.166μSiemens). To perform this evaluation, we designed and implemented the GSR sensor, which consists of a pair of finger electrodes, a voltage divider circuit, a Wheatstone bridge circuit, an instrumentation amplifier, an Arduino Nano controller circuit, and a display module. The evaluation tested four different sensitivity resistances of the Wheatstone bridge circuit: 50kΩ, 100kΩ, 150kΩ, and 200kΩ. Digital values were measured and calculated for each sensitivity resistance when measuring skin resistance values from 0Ω to 30MΩ with a 50kΩ step increment. These values simulated all six stress level conditions. The measurement showed that the sensitivity resistances of 200kΩ, 150kΩ, 100kΩ, and 50kΩ resulted in a range of skin resistances (with an average percentage relative error) of 3MΩ - 250kΩ (0.45%), 3MΩ - 200kΩ (1.06%), 3MΩ - 150kΩ (1.29%), and 2.4MΩ - 100kΩ (1.09%), respectively.
Co-Authors Hendi Handian Rachmat