Yulianti, Silvina Rosita
Department Of Statistics, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Improving the Accuracy of Discrepancies in Farmers' Purchasing and Selling Index Prediction by Incorporating Weather Factors Yulianti, Silvina Rosita; Effendie, Adhitya Ronnie; Susyanto, Nanang
JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Vol 8, No 3 (2024): July
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jtam.v8i3.22584

Abstract

One measure that can be used to see the level of farmer welfare is the farmer exchange rate (NTP), which is a comparative calculation between the price index received by farmers (IJ) and the price index paid by farmers (IB), expressed as a percentage. In reality, NTP cannot explain the actual welfare situation of farmers because the ratio value has the potential to produce biased values. Another alternative that can be used to look at farmer welfare with less potential bias is to look at the difference between the sales index and the farmer purchasing index (ID). ID data forecasting can be a reference for developing and optimizing things that need to be improved in the agricultural sector. Despite the fact that a number of external factors, such as variations in the weather throughout the year, had a significant impact on the ID value, previous research used the ARIMA model to forecast without taking exogenous factors into account. Therefore, the goal of this research is to identify the optimal ARIMAX regression model for achieving accurate forecasting results with minimal error values. This research was carried out with limitations using data from the Central Statistics Agency and the Meteorological, Climatological, and Geophysical Agency in Central Java from 2008 to 2023. The first method in this research is to prepare the data, which involved collecting secondary data such as IJ and IB along with climate data such as rainfall, duration of sunlight, air pressure, wind speed, and rice prices. Next, calculate the difference between IJ and IB to determine the ID value. Then, verify the ID data's stationarity and perform AR and MA calculations. After determining the AR and MA values, construct an ARIMAX model that incorporates external factors, search for the optimal model, and utilize the optimal model to make future predictions. The results show that the accuracy of the ARIMAX model (1,1,0) has a better value than the accuracy of the ARIMA model (1,1,0), and the results obtained in this study are better than previous studies. The authors hope that the findings of this research will serve as a benchmark for the forecasting analysis of time series data in the agricultural sector, providing the local government with a foundation for policy decisions.
Application of Proportional Hazard and Additive Models in the Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients Muhammad Bayu Nirwana; Tiara Fitri Adani; Kayla Argya Puruhita; Andreas Rony Wijaya; Hasih Pratiwi; Silvina Rosita Yulianti
JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Vol 10, No 3 (2026): July
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jtam.v10i3.37028

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women and one of the highest causes of death among other types of cancer. This study aims to evaluate the methodological advantages of additive hazard models over the multiplicative Cox model in identifying temporal risk factors for breast cancer survival. Using secondary data from 1458 patients and 10 covariates, applying three methods, Cox proportional hazards model, Lin-Ying additive hazard model, and Aalen additive hazard model. The proportional hazard assumption test indicated that Cox regression model did not fully satisfy the assumption; therefore, the Lin–Ying and Aalen additive models were applied. In the Lin–Ying models, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), and tumor size were identified as significant predictors of survival, whereas in the Aalen model, significant factors also included age and chemotherapy in addition to those four covariates. These findings highlight that while the Cox model provides efficient estimation and interpretable hazard ratios, the Lin–Ying and Aalen models offer more robust alternatives when the proportional hazard assumption is violated. The Aalen model was selected based on the results of the Aalen plot. Overall, risk control efforts in breast cancer patients should focus on managing NPI scores and tumor size as well as ensuring appropriate therapies, particularly hormonal therapy and radiotherapy, which have been demonstrated to provide protective effects.