Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Jendela Hukum
Utamie, R. Aj. Nindya Rizky
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PEMBUAT SERTIFIKAT AKSIN COVID-19 TANPA VAKSINASI Zeinudin, Moh.; Utamie, R. Aj. Nindya Rizky
Jurnal Jendela Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2023): JENDELA HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wiraraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/jjh.v10i1.2951

Abstract

Covid-19 rocked Indonesia in early 2020. In the course of time, Covid-19 has spread to 34 provinces in Indonesia. The member of these cases is increasing every day. Cries of confusion from the people sounded fromall directions. In dealing with this, the Government of Indonesia issued a program that cannot be separated from the pro and con attitudes of the community, namely the vaccination program. Behind this program it turns out that it also gave birth to several “rogue” parties who became the issues of the Covid-19 Vaccine Certificates without going through the vaccination proces either in the form of letters of electronic documents. Some experts have dismissed the issue of this. Things like this are the Government’s homeworks to be throughly investigated and no longer appear in the community.
STUDI KOMPARATIF ABORSI DI INDONESIA DAN KOREA SELATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY Utamie, R. Aj. Nindya Rizky
Jurnal Jendela Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2023): JENDELA HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wiraraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/jjh.v10i2.2976

Abstract

Abortion in Indonesia is still considered taboo and criminalized, while abortion in South Korea is the opposite. Countries that use the same legal system do not mean their regulations are also the same. Abortion raises different opinions from Pro-Life and Pro-Choice people. Analysis of feminist legal theory, especially radical feminism, is used to see the response of Indonesia and South Korea to abortion. This research aims to: 1) determine abortion regulations in Indonesia and South Korea; and 2) analysis of feminist legal theory regarding abortion in Indonesia and South Korea. This research is normative legal research or doctrinal research, using a statutory-regulatory approach, contextual approach, and comparative study. The data sources used are primary legal materials, namely Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, the Criminal Code, and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. Secondary legal materials are in the form of literature reviews related to legal materials that are appropriate to the research topic. The research shows that abortion in Indonesia is not fully legalized, in contrast to South Korea which has lifted the ban on abortion after the decision of the South Korean Constitutional Court. Based on the analysis of Feminist Legal Theory, Indonesia still has not accepted and accommodated all forms of demands from feminism, while South Korea considers abortion to be a woman's right and what is within a woman is her full right.
Co-Authors Moh. Zeinudin Septiarahma, Fadilah Stogmuller, Katharina