Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum Tribakti: jurnal pemikiran keIslaman Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Uğur, Hakan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
The Late Period Mutazilite Mufassir: A Biographical Study of Hākim Al-Jushamī Andriawan, Didik; Uğur, Hakan; Akpınar, Ali; Dadan, Ali
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 35 No. 2 (2024): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v35i2.5109

Abstract

This article aims to explore Hakim al-Jushamī, a Mutazilite mufassir from the late period, through a biographical analysis, as well as to delve into his exegetical ideas. He is recognized as a trailblazer in Islamic thought, particularly within the Mu’tazila school, and has made significant contributions to the field of tafsir (Quranic exegesis). His persona is regarded as the bridge reinstating the interrupted scholarly lineage between Zamakhsharī and the earlier commentators of tafsir. His principal contribution to the field of tafsir is al-Tahdhīb fi al-Tafsīr, a compilation that amalgamates the diverse viewpoints of Mu’tazila scholars whose narratives are not documented in other works. This article is centered on two primary objectives: (1) A biographical analysis of Jushamī within the context of Mu’tazila scholarship. (2) An examination of Jushamī in his capacity as a Mu’tazila mufassir and scholar. The research employs a qualitative methodology, adopting a biographical study approach through a literature review. The research employs data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion as its analytical techniques. The research analysis encompasses an examination of the individual in the socio-historical context and a critique of Mu’tazila philosophy and tafsir (Quranic exegesis) as manifested in his works. The findings revealed that: (1) Jushamī’s life, from a socio-historical perspective, exhibits a close association with Mu’tazila and positions him as an integral component of the Mu’tazila intellectual lineage that connects Zamakhsharī to earlier scholars. (2) His diverse body of work is primarily centered on advocating and defending the Mu’tazila doctrine. (3) Jushamī is regarded as a representation of the concluding era of Mu’tazila mufassirs before the group eventually vanished.
A Comparative Legal Analysis of Freedom of Belief and Worship in Turkey UGUR, Hakan; GÜLOĞLU, Nazife Vildan; Guloglu, Yavuz
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 12, No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i3.43849

Abstract

Freedom of Belief and Freedom of Worship are interrelated and complementary freedoms. While belief primarily concerns the internal aspect of an individual, their spirit and worship can be seen as the manifestation of belief, transitioning from the abstract to the tangible. Freedom of belief and worship are among the inalienable fundamental rights established in national, regional, and international human rights documents. Recognised as one of the core values of a democratic society, freedom of belief is considered a fundamental right that cannot be restricted, even in times of war or emergency. The scope of these rights and freedoms, as enshrined in the constitutions of modern societies, has expanded over time in favour of liberties through legislative regulations and judicial rulings. Generally, in the decisions of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights, to which Turkey is a party, it is emphasised that the internal aspect of freedom of belief is an inseparable part of one’s personality, making this freedom non-restrictable. However, it is difficult to assert that freedom of worship, which serves as an outward expression of this liberty, is fully guaranteed by the legal system, as it is acknowledged that this freedom can be restricted in line with the requirements of a democratic society. Given that the boundaries of freedom of belief and worship cannot be distinctly defined and that separating these two domains is highly complex, it must be recognised that any intervention or limitation on freedom of worship inevitably impacts freedom of belief. This study will examine international legal regulations on freedom of belief and worship, constitutional provisions, and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court on this matter. Additionally, progress made in Turkey, along with challenges and shortcomings encountered in practice, will be addressed, and potential solutions will be offered. The topic will also be compared from a religious perspective, assessing the role of religion concerning these freedoms.
The Late Period Mutazilite Mufassir: A Biographical Study of Hākim Al-Jushamī Andriawan, Didik; Uğur, Hakan; Akpınar, Ali; Dadan, Ali
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 35 No. 2 (2024): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v35i2.5109

Abstract

This article aims to explore Hakim al-Jushamī, a Mutazilite mufassir from the late period, through a biographical analysis, as well as to delve into his exegetical ideas. He is recognized as a trailblazer in Islamic thought, particularly within the Mu’tazila school, and has made significant contributions to the field of tafsir (Quranic exegesis). His persona is regarded as the bridge reinstating the interrupted scholarly lineage between Zamakhsharī and the earlier commentators of tafsir. His principal contribution to the field of tafsir is al-Tahdhīb fi al-Tafsīr, a compilation that amalgamates the diverse viewpoints of Mu’tazila scholars whose narratives are not documented in other works. This article is centered on two primary objectives: (1) A biographical analysis of Jushamī within the context of Mu’tazila scholarship. (2) An examination of Jushamī in his capacity as a Mu’tazila mufassir and scholar. The research employs a qualitative methodology, adopting a biographical study approach through a literature review. The research employs data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion as its analytical techniques. The research analysis encompasses an examination of the individual in the socio-historical context and a critique of Mu’tazila philosophy and tafsir (Quranic exegesis) as manifested in his works. The findings revealed that: (1) Jushamī’s life, from a socio-historical perspective, exhibits a close association with Mu’tazila and positions him as an integral component of the Mu’tazila intellectual lineage that connects Zamakhsharī to earlier scholars. (2) His diverse body of work is primarily centered on advocating and defending the Mu’tazila doctrine. (3) Jushamī is regarded as a representation of the concluding era of Mu’tazila mufassirs before the group eventually vanished.
A Comparative Legal Analysis of Freedom of Belief and Worship in Turkey UGUR, Hakan; GÜLOĞLU, Nazife Vildan; Guloglu, Yavuz
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i3.43849

Abstract

Freedom of Belief and Freedom of Worship are interrelated and complementary freedoms. While belief primarily concerns the internal aspect of an individual, their spirit and worship can be seen as the manifestation of belief, transitioning from the abstract to the tangible. Freedom of belief and worship are among the inalienable fundamental rights established in national, regional, and international human rights documents. Recognised as one of the core values of a democratic society, freedom of belief is considered a fundamental right that cannot be restricted, even in times of war or emergency. The scope of these rights and freedoms, as enshrined in the constitutions of modern societies, has expanded over time in favour of liberties through legislative regulations and judicial rulings. Generally, in the decisions of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights, to which Turkey is a party, it is emphasised that the internal aspect of freedom of belief is an inseparable part of one’s personality, making this freedom non-restrictable. However, it is difficult to assert that freedom of worship, which serves as an outward expression of this liberty, is fully guaranteed by the legal system, as it is acknowledged that this freedom can be restricted in line with the requirements of a democratic society. Given that the boundaries of freedom of belief and worship cannot be distinctly defined and that separating these two domains is highly complex, it must be recognised that any intervention or limitation on freedom of worship inevitably impacts freedom of belief. This study will examine international legal regulations on freedom of belief and worship, constitutional provisions, and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court on this matter. Additionally, progress made in Turkey, along with challenges and shortcomings encountered in practice, will be addressed, and potential solutions will be offered. The topic will also be compared from a religious perspective, assessing the role of religion concerning these freedoms.
Co-Authors Akpınar, Ali Andriawan, Didik Dadan, Ali GÜLOĞLU, Nazife Vildan Guloglu, Yavuz