Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Hukum Tentang Perkawinan (Perbandingan Antara Kuh Perdata Indonesia, Inggris Dan Amerika) Rizki Nurdiansyah; Muhammad Adam Damiri; Melly Rifa’atul Lailiyah
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v1i2.1463

Abstract

Laws regarding marriage are an important part of the legal system in various countries. In this context, this research aims to compare the laws regarding marriage in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes. The aim of this research is to analyze the differences and similarities in the legal regulation of marriage, including marriage requirements, the marriage process, and the rights and obligations of husband and wife in the three legal systems. This research uses a comparative legal approach, by analyzing legal regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature from the three countries. The data sources used include legal regulations regarding marriage, related court decisions, as well as legal literature that reviews aspects of marriage law in Indonesia, England and America. Data analysis was carried out by comparing the differences and similarities in marriage requirements, the marriage process, and the rights and obligations of married couples in the three countries. Factors such as religion, culture, and legal history will be considered in this comparative analysis. The results of this study show significant differences in the legal arrangements for marriage between the three countries. For example, in the Indonesian Civil Code, marriage can be religious or civil, while in England and America, civil marriage is the only legally recognized form. Marriage requirements such as minimum age, parental consent, and conditions for same-sex marriage may also differ in the three countries.
Hukum Tentang Perkawinan (Perbandingan Antara Kuh Perdata Indonesia, Inggris Dan Amerika) Rizki Nurdiansyah; Muhammad Adam Damiri; Melly Rifa’atul Lailiyah
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v1i2.1463

Abstract

Laws regarding marriage are an important part of the legal system in various countries. In this context, this research aims to compare the laws regarding marriage in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes. The aim of this research is to analyze the differences and similarities in the legal regulation of marriage, including marriage requirements, the marriage process, and the rights and obligations of husband and wife in the three legal systems. This research uses a comparative legal approach, by analyzing legal regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature from the three countries. The data sources used include legal regulations regarding marriage, related court decisions, as well as legal literature that reviews aspects of marriage law in Indonesia, England and America. Data analysis was carried out by comparing the differences and similarities in marriage requirements, the marriage process, and the rights and obligations of married couples in the three countries. Factors such as religion, culture, and legal history will be considered in this comparative analysis. The results of this study show significant differences in the legal arrangements for marriage between the three countries. For example, in the Indonesian Civil Code, marriage can be religious or civil, while in England and America, civil marriage is the only legally recognized form. Marriage requirements such as minimum age, parental consent, and conditions for same-sex marriage may also differ in the three countries.
Hukum Tentang Orang (Perbandingan Antara KUH Perdata Indonesia, Inggris Dan Amerika) Rizki Nurdiansyah; Muhammad Adam Damiri
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.649

Abstract

The law of persons is an important aspect of a country's legal system that regulates the status, rights and obligations of individuals. In this study, we will compare the legal treatment of persons in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes. This comparative analysis will cover several aspects,including the legal status of persons, personal rights, and legal obligations relating to individuals. The comparison begins by looking at the legal status of people within the three legal systems. The Indonesian Civil Code recognizes a person's legal status based on nationality, age, and legal capacity. In the UK, the legal status of a person is determined by nationality and citizenship status, whereas in the United States, the legal status of a person relates to citizenship, nationality and immigration status. The abstract is short, about 150-200 words, written with the size of 10. The abstract should be informative and briefly described the research background (review), research purposes, research method, main results, and main conclusion. The abstract is often presented separately from the complete script, so it must be able to stand on itself. The library is not allowed to be listed in the abstract, but if it is important then the citation refers only to the name of the first author and the year. The abstract is written in Indonesian and English. In this overall comparison, it was found that although there are differences in legal approaches to persons in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes, there are also some similarities in the protection of individual rights. Universal legal principles such as liberty, human rights and legal responsibility remain the cornerstone of these three legal systems. Further research on this comparison can provide deeper insights in understanding legal protection for individuals in different contexts