Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Nurkhalisah Nurkhalisah
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Konflik Batas Wilayah Sipadan Dan Ligitan Dalam Hukum Internasional Seri Mughni Sulubara; Oni Tri Asri; Maulida Maulida; Sinta Amelia; Hasma Yanti; Namira Simah Bengi; Maula fitri; Zikri Yandi; M Fizza Anggara; Diana Juwita; Fachrul Razi; Niswatul Khaira; Laya Shafura; Nurkhalisah Nurkhalisah
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Maret : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1637

Abstract

The dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia over the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan continued throughout the years until 1997. The issue of Sipadan and Ligitan islands was resolved by international law through the International Court of Justice. The two islands located in the middle of Indonesia, precisely in the Makassar Strait, were finally won by the Malaysian side on December 17, 2002. The theory used in this research is the theory of legal protection. The theory of legal protection is very relevant to the research made here, because there is a need for legal protection regarding territorial boundaries in the territorial sovereignty of the State of Indonesia. The research method used regarding international legal protection of the Sipadan-Ligitan island dispute is carried out by means of qualitative descriptive research. The technique or instrument of data collection used is library research by studying various books as literature, official documents, laws and regulations, results of previous research, and other literature sources related to the problems studied. The decision of the international court on December 17, 2002 in its decision gave sovereignty over the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan to Malaysia, the international court declared Malaysia as the most entitled party to the two islands based on three main statements that were used as the basis for claims by both countries.
Perlindungan Hukum Konflik Batas Wilayah Sipadan Dan Ligitan Dalam Hukum Internasional Seri Mughni Sulubara; Oni Tri Asri; Maulida Maulida; Sinta Amelia; Hasma Yanti; Namira Simah Bengi; Maula fitri; Zikri Yandi; M Fizza Anggara; Diana Juwita; Fachrul Razi; Niswatul Khaira; Laya Shafura; Nurkhalisah Nurkhalisah
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1637

Abstract

The dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia over the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan continued throughout the years until 1997. The issue of Sipadan and Ligitan islands was resolved by international law through the International Court of Justice. The two islands located in the middle of Indonesia, precisely in the Makassar Strait, were finally won by the Malaysian side on December 17, 2002. The theory used in this research is the theory of legal protection. The theory of legal protection is very relevant to the research made here, because there is a need for legal protection regarding territorial boundaries in the territorial sovereignty of the State of Indonesia. The research method used regarding international legal protection of the Sipadan-Ligitan island dispute is carried out by means of qualitative descriptive research. The technique or instrument of data collection used is library research by studying various books as literature, official documents, laws and regulations, results of previous research, and other literature sources related to the problems studied. The decision of the international court on December 17, 2002 in its decision gave sovereignty over the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan to Malaysia, the international court declared Malaysia as the most entitled party to the two islands based on three main statements that were used as the basis for claims by both countries.
Legal Protection Against Cybercrime from Ransomware Attacks and Evaluation of the 2025 Cyber Security and Resilience Bill in Indonesia's Defense Seri Mughni Sulubara; Virdyra Tasril; Nurkhalisah Nurkhalisah
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): September : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1234

Abstract

This research examines in-depth legal protection against cybercrime in Indonesia, with a specific focus on ransomware attacks. It also evaluates the 2025 Draft Cyber Security and Resilience Law (RUU KKS) as a measure to strengthen the national cyber defense system. The increase in ransomware cases targeting personal data, public institutions, and vital infrastructure has posed a serious threat to information security and national stability. Although the 2008 Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the 2022 Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) serve as the legal basis, these two regulations do not yet specifically and comprehensively regulate ransomware. This results in challenges in law enforcement and victim protection, both in technical aspects, coordination, and human rights protection. The research method used is normative legal with a qualitative approach, which includes analysis of primary and secondary legal materials, as well as comparisons with regulations in several countries that have more mature ransomware handling mechanisms. The analysis of the 2025 Cyber Security Bill (RUU KKS) indicates that this draft regulation has the potential to strengthen the authority of cyber authorities, mandate reporting of cyber incidents, and impose stricter sanctions on perpetrators. However, implementing this policy requires effective cross-agency coordination, transparent oversight, and synergy between the public and private sectors. This study concludes that the 2025 Cyber Security Bill (RUU KKS) represents a strategic step in building a national cybersecurity system that is adaptive, integrated, and responsive to evolving cyber threats. However, its success will depend heavily on improving public digital security literacy, multi-sectoral collaboration, investment in detection and prevention technology, and guaranteeing human rights protection. These findings are expected to provide input for policymakers in formulating comprehensive and sustainable cybersecurity regulations as a bulwark of national defense in the digital era.
Co-Authors Diana Juwita Fachrul Razi Hasma Yanti Laya Shafura M Fizza Anggara Maula fitri Maulida Maulida Mughni Sulubara, Seri Namira Simah Bengi Niswatul Khaira Oni Tri Asri Sinta Amelia Virdyra Tasril Zikri Yandi