Rubaie, Ach
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN THE ACT OF THEFT (VIDE ARTICLE 362 KUHP) OF GOLD WHICH IS COMMITTED ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS (VOORTGEZETTE HANDELING VIDE ARTICLE 64 KUHP) Adistyawan, Fany; Rubaie, Ach; Khoidin, M; Djaja, Dudik
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v5i2.1442

Abstract

Continuing actions are a combination of several actions committed by a person, where between one action and another action there has never been a judge's decision that has permanent legal force, so that the perpetrator is subject to a certain method of punishment, as stipulated in article 64 of the Criminal Code. This combined form in Dutch is known as "Voortgezette Handling". The form of continuous action can be identified if a person commits several actions and some of these actions are separate crimes but among these actions, there is such a close relationship with one another that several of these actions must be considered as one continuous action. Continued theft is explained in Article 362 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The formulation of the problem in this study is how is the legal responsibility for the crime of gold theft by continuing Article 362 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and law enforcement for the crime of gold theft by continuing Article 362 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The type of method applied in this research is normative legal research, where normative legal research is a scientific research procedure to find truth based on scientific logic from a normative perspective. using a statutory regulation approach is analyzed using qualitative normative methods with inductive logic, namely thinking from specific matters to general matters. Criminal responsibility is the responsibility of a person for the crime he has committed. Strictly speaking, that person is responsible for the crime he committed. Thus, the occurrence of criminal liability because there has been a criminal act committed by someone. Criminal responsibility is essentially a mechanism built by criminal law to react to violations of the "agreement to refuse" a certain act.Law enforcement by the Pasuruan Police through investigation and investigation the conclusion that it is strongly suspected that the suspect has violated Article 362 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. Meanwhile, the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the case is that the legal facts that emerged during the trial, prove that all the elements of Article 362 Jo. Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code has been fulfilled, so the Defendant must be legally and convincingly proven to have committed the crime as charged in the Public Prosecutor's single Indictment.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial Kuncoro, Fikron Abdul Hamid; Rubaie, Ach
Begawan Abioso Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023): Begawan Abioso
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/abioso.v14i1.675

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ujaran kebencian yang dikirimkan kepada individu atau kelompok tertentu yang belakangan ini mendapat perhatian luas. Ujaran kebencian semakin ramai diperbincangkan melalui unggahan di media sosial. Banyak pengguna internet menyebarkan unggahan yang berisi hinaan, fitnah, hujatan dan ujaran kebencian lainnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan atau ketidaklengkapan undang-undang lengkap harus dijelaskan atau dilengkapi dengan temuan hukum. Terkait dengan tindak pidana ujaran kebencian, meliputi semua tindakan serta upaya seseorang ataupun lebih menyebarkan kebencian atau menghasut seseorang, baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Selain itu, upaya penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan ujaran kebencian wajib dilakukan sesuai aturan perundangan yang mengatur kejahatan. Penegakan hukum pidana adalah proses peradilan pidana, diproses peradilan pidana, aparat penegak hukum, baik itu aparat kepolisian, kejaksaan, ataupun hakim, wajib senantiasa memberi perhatian pada tujuan hukum, yakni mengutamakan keadilan, kepentingan, serta jaminan kepastian hukum dengan mengutamakan penemuan hukum.