Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Anaesthesia and Pain
Subagyo, Houdini Pradanawan
Unknown Affiliation
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Neuroanesthesia Management in Transspenoidal Pituitary Cyst Surgery Subagyo, Houdini Pradanawan; Nofiyanto, Eko
Journal of Anaesthesia and Pain Vol 5, No 1 (2024): January
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jap.2024.005.01.03

Abstract

Background: Neuroanesthesia management of patients with masses in the sella area undergoing transspenoidal surgery is a challenge for anesthesiologists. Good preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management is shown to improve the patient’s quality of life.Case: A 45-year-old man with chief complaints of headache and visual disturbances, from the results of the vision examination obtained visus 1/60 (count fingers) and narrowed visual field area. From computerized tomography (CT) scan and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the Head obtained a picture of cystic mass of the suprasellar sella pressing the optic chiasm. The patient was planned for surgical excision of pituitary cyst per transspenoidal. The patient underwent general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation with intravenous induction fentanyl, propofol, atracurium and lidocaine, followed by maintenance with sevoflurane inhalation agent with 60% oxygen. During the operation the hemodynamic condition was stable and postoperatively the patient was extubated in the operating room and then treated in the intensive care unit.Conclusion: In pituitary cyst patients undergoing transspenoidal surgery, the preoperative evaluation is mainly aimed at airway assessment, neurological disorders and hormonal disorders in patients. During intraoperative, the anesthesiologist is expected to optimize cerebral oxygenation, maintain hemodynamic stability, facilitate the surgical area, prevent and manage intraoperative complications and rapid recovery of consciousness. Postoperatively a good neuroendocrine evaluation is required
Comparison of Intermittent Epidural Bolus and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Postoperative Pain Management in Abdominal Surgery Patients Siswagama, Taufiq Agus; Asmoro, Aswoco Andyk; Subagyo, Houdini Pradanawan; Laksono, Buyung Hartiyo
Journal of Anaesthesia and Pain Vol 5, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jap.2024.005.03.02

Abstract

Background: Abdominal surgery often leads to high postoperative pain scores, which are commonly managed using epidural analgesia through either continuous infusion or intermittent bolus administration. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion in managing postoperative pain among patients who underwent abdominal surgery.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 patients who underwent abdominal surgery and were randomly assigned to two groups. Group one received intermittent epidural bolus analgesia with ropivacaine 0.1875% and fentanyl 50 µg, administered as 10 cm³ every 8 hours (n=45). Group two received continuous epidural infusion analgesia with ropivacaine 0.1875% and fentanyl 100 µg, in a total volume of 50 cm³ at a rate of 3 cm³/hour (n=45). Pain levels were assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and during movement, measured every 12 hours for 84 hours. Statistical analysis was conducted using the independent t-test with a significance level of α=0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.Result: At 24 hours postoperatively, the NRS at rest was significantly lower in the continuous infusion epidural (0.15 ± 0.36) compared to the intermittent bolus (0.91 ± 0.35) (p=0.000), and this trend persisted at subsequent time points (36, 48, 60, 72, and 80 hours postoperatively). For movement, the NRS at 36 hours was also lower in the continuous infusion epidural (1.00 ± 0.00) compared to the intermittent bolus (1.29 ± 0.45) (p=0.000), with similar differences observed at other time points.Conclusion: Continuous epidural infusion provides superior analgesia to intermittent epidural bolus administration in abdominal surgery patients. This method is associated with faster and sustained reductions in pain intensity at rest and during movement.
Comparison of Intermittent Epidural Bolus and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Postoperative Pain Management in Abdominal Surgery Patients Siswagama, Taufiq Agus; Asmoro, Aswoco Andyk; Subagyo, Houdini Pradanawan; Laksono, Buyung Hartiyo
Journal of Anaesthesia and Pain Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jap.2024.005.03.02

Abstract

Background: Abdominal surgery often leads to high postoperative pain scores, which are commonly managed using epidural analgesia through either continuous infusion or intermittent bolus administration. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion in managing postoperative pain among patients who underwent abdominal surgery.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 patients who underwent abdominal surgery and were randomly assigned to two groups. Group one received intermittent epidural bolus analgesia with ropivacaine 0.1875% and fentanyl 50 µg, administered as 10 cm³ every 8 hours (n=45). Group two received continuous epidural infusion analgesia with ropivacaine 0.1875% and fentanyl 100 µg, in a total volume of 50 cm³ at a rate of 3 cm³/hour (n=45). Pain levels were assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and during movement, measured every 12 hours for 84 hours. Statistical analysis was conducted using the independent t-test with a significance level of α=0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.Result: At 24 hours postoperatively, the NRS at rest was significantly lower in the continuous infusion epidural (0.15 ± 0.36) compared to the intermittent bolus (0.91 ± 0.35) (p=0.000), and this trend persisted at subsequent time points (36, 48, 60, 72, and 80 hours postoperatively). For movement, the NRS at 36 hours was also lower in the continuous infusion epidural (1.00 ± 0.00) compared to the intermittent bolus (1.29 ± 0.45) (p=0.000), with similar differences observed at other time points.Conclusion: Continuous epidural infusion provides superior analgesia to intermittent epidural bolus administration in abdominal surgery patients. This method is associated with faster and sustained reductions in pain intensity at rest and during movement.
Co-Authors Aswoco Andyk Asmoro Eko Nofiyanto Laksono, Buyung Hartiyo Taufiq Agus Siswagama