Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Critical Review on Financial Reporting Practices by Islamic Banks: (Comparison between AAOIFI and IFRS) Perwiragama, Salman Abdurrubi; Fauziyah, Tias Rahmi
Nurani Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v22i2.13584

Abstract

This paper summarizes the findings of a comparative critical examination of the financial reporting methods of Bank Al-Barakah, BTPN Syariah, and Maybank Islamic Berhad. Due to the discrepancy between theory and practice, several past studies have found that Islamic banks need to alter the implementation of their financing facilities. This fact requires clarification. The research employs the quantitative descriptive method and theoretical with secondary data sources derived from literature research, as well as the IASB Conceptual Framework, AAOIFI Conceptual Framework, Resolution 2 of the Sharia Advisory Committee of Bank Negara Malaysia (SAC BNM), Statement of Islamic Financial Accounting Standards (PSAK Syariah), and other related references. The findings of this study indicate that AAOIFI and IFRS interpret the objectives of financial reporting differently. AAOIFI serves sharia principles as an intrinsic component of financial reporting, whereas IFRS implements neutrality of financial reporting from religion or standard components. Overall, the authors of this article maintain that Islamic banks conform to AAOIFI criteria for all of its components, including financial reporting objectives, key accounting assumptions, and SLM-based revenue estimation.
KETIKA INDEPENDENSI MENJADI TOLAK UKUR KUALITAS AUDIT Fauziyah, Tias Rahmi
RISTANSI: Riset Akuntansi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): RISTANSI: Riset Akuntansi, Volume 5, Nomor 1, Juni 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Akuntansi Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Asia Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32815/ristansi.v5i1.2269

Abstract

This study emphasizes that an auditor's independence can support the outcomes of the audit report, thereby serving as a benchmark for audit quality. The type of research used is qualitative research with a literature review approach by seeking information through books, journals, and other literature. The research findings reveal several approaches to measuring audit quality, including process quality, result quality, and follow-up quality. Result and process oriented approaches are better able to illustrate how auditors perform their work to achieve a measurable audit quality. Auditor independence is divided into three aspects: independence in fact, independence in appearance, and independence in expertise or competence. The higher independence of an auditor, the more it can enhance the quality of the audit performed. Audit standards emphasize not only the importance of independence in conducting audits but also the aspects of appearance and the reality of that independence.