Nabila Fitria Almadea
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Urgensi Pembaharuan Acara Hukum Pidana Terkait Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perspektif Tujuan Hukum Felen Felen; Nabila Fitria Almadea
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober : Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v1i4.528

Abstract

Globalization affects the development of technology that facilitates human activities, but also presents a threat in the form of cyber crime. Cyber crime utilizes computers and the internet as its main tools. However, KUHAP has not fully regulated the validity of electronic evidence which is vital in handling cyber crime cases. This lack of clarity will not provide justice, benefit, and legal certainty to the community, as the purpose of the law itself should be. Therefore, the discussion of the validity of electronic evidence is important, considering its influence in deciding a case. With the alignment of das sein and das sollen, it is hoped that the real purpose of law will be achieved. This research highlights the urgency of legal reform along with technological developments in order to reduce the reduction of legal objectives and realize dynamic positive law in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical research or normative legal research. The results of the research are expected to contribute to the development of relevant laws.
Urgensi Pembaharuan Acara Hukum Pidana Terkait Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perspektif Tujuan Hukum Felen Felen; Nabila Fitria Almadea
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v1i3.74

Abstract

Globalization affects the development of technology that facilitates human activities, but also presents a threat in the form of cyber crime. Cyber crime utilizes computers and the internet as its main tools. However, KUHAP has not fully regulated the validity of electronic evidence which is vital in handling cyber crime cases. This lack of clarity will not provide justice, benefit, and legal certainty to the community, as the purpose of the law itself should be. Therefore, the discussion of the validity of electronic evidence is important, considering its influence in deciding a case. With the alignment of das sein and das sollen, it is hoped that the real purpose of law will be achieved. This research highlights the urgency of legal reform along with technological developments in order to reduce the reduction of legal objectives and realize dynamic positive law in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical research or normative legal research. The results of the research are expected to contribute to the development of relevant laws.
Keterlibatan Artificial Intelligence sebagai Katalisator Perancangan Putusan Perkara Perdata di Indonesia Alexandro Wiranto Tambe; Amiradiaty Nasution; Nabila Fitria Almadea
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei: Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i2.568

Abstract

AI has been widely used in various nations, especially in the economy, healthcare, and law. However, its current state is limited to weak AI, lacking full awareness and control. Some countries use AI to assist legal professionals in analyzing legal documents and in helping judges with research during court proceedings. Thus, exploring AI's role and regulation in making civil case decisions within Indonesian law is crucial. This study relies on secondary data and normative legal methods. Findings suggest weak AI is promising for crafting judgments in Indonesian civil cases due to its focus on formal truth. Implementing regulations, possibly Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA), is necessary for the possible use of AI in Indonesia's court proceedings. These rules should define, classify, and limit AI, ensuring legal reliability in its application.