Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Karnelia, Nazwa
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Keabsahan Akta Dibawah Tangan pada Kredit Mobil dalam Perjanjian Fidusia Karnelia, Nazwa
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): February: Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v2i1.97

Abstract

In the development of technology and information, developments in means of transportation cannot be separated, which as time changes, always offers the newest forms of technology, even in terms of vehicle design. In its current development, cars are a means of transportation that can be said to be owned by all groups. The need to have this means of transportation makes it possible for consumers who need a car as a means of transportation but it is not always available and accessible to the general public. Non-bank financial institutions exist as an effort to facilitate the community in meeting their needs. Credit is an alternative for the community as an alternative effort to meet existing needs. Fiduciary guarantees are regulated in Law Number 42 of 1999 in order to maintain security in the credit process and to become a credit object registered with the Fiduciary. In legal research, it is explained that the rights and obligations on the part of the consumer are to pay the consumer with the nominal value of the party making the sale and then take back the car as an object of consumer financing guarantee if in the future there is a default. If a default occurs, the buyer is obliged to provide compensation, namely canceling the agreement under compelling circumstances
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Putusan Nomor 154 PK/TUN/2016 Karnelia, Nazwa
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): February: Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v2i1.114

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the struggle for justice, the whole community wants to get its rights fairly. Not only the people, but the state institutions also have the right to justice in the eyes of the law. According to Article 263, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Constitution, it is explicitly stated that only the Supreme Court or its heirs may apply for a decision. The other party was not explicitly mentioned, but it was the Attorney General. The debate over the Supreme Court's approval of the General Prosecutor's review has not yet been opened. The jurists, the legalists, and the scholars have spoken a great many words. Not a few of them disagree with the judgement of the Supreme Court, but some of them understand it. As a result of various academic discussions and research, it appears that the emerging perspective is coloured by a different background of understanding. Some people seem to be based on a strong understanding of the teachings of positivism, while others appear to be founded on a closer understanding of legal realism.In the conflict present in Decision No. 154 PK/TUN/2016, land disputes disputed rights between state institutions and family heirs. The re-examination carried out with new evidence by the petitioner determines whether it serves justice to the parties." Keywords : Judicial Review; Juridical Review ; State Administration
Co-Authors