Latour, Jos M.
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Measuring the purpose in life in the adult population: A scoping review Arunjit, Somrudee; Balthip, Karnsunaphat; Latour, Jos M.
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): March - April
Publisher : Belitung Raya Foundation, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3176

Abstract

Background: The purpose in life can motivate individuals to realize that life is essential for existence and well-being. Adults might experience crises that can lead to a lack of purpose in life. Consequently, promoting purpose in life is necessary, but it requires a suitable measurement scale. Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify and map the content, psychometric properties, and answer option scales of instruments intended to measure purpose in life in adult populations. Design: A scoping review was employed. Data Sources: The database used was PubMed. The libraries were APA PsycNet, Wiley Online Library, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy was performed between 1 November 2023 and 14 February 2024. Review Methods: This review used the scoping review framework described by Arksey and O’Malley. The identified instruments were assessed for quality based on the COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. This study also used the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guideline. Results: A total of 348 studies were identified, and seven articles were involved in the final synthesis. These seven articles included five instruments measuring the concept of purpose in life, of which two instruments had two versions: 1) Purpose in Life Test (20 items, 4 items); 2) Life Engagement Test (6 items); 3) Psychological Well-Being (120 items, 18 items); 4) Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (9 items); and 5) National Institutes of Health Tuberculosis Meaning and Purpose Scale Age 18+ (18 items). The validity of all instruments was tested using factor analysis, known groups, face, concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and construct validity. The reliability of four instruments was tested by Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman-Brown formula. Conclusion: Five instruments measuring purpose in life in the adult population with adequate psychometric properties were identified. The clinical implication of this study suggests that nurses may consider employing an appropriate instrument to assess the purpose of life in the adult population, thus enabling them to offer holistic, individualized care to adults, particularly addressing the spiritual dimension.
Quality of life among Indonesian family caregivers caring for dependent older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the community: A cross-sectional, correlational study Siregar, Rinco; Kritpracha, Charuwan; Chinnawong, Tippamas; Latour, Jos M.
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): January - February
Publisher : Belitung Raya Foundation, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3683

Abstract

Background: The global prevalence of older adults with diabetes has increased, and family caregivers in Indonesia play a critical role in managing diabetes and providing personal care. However, caregiving can be complex and challenging, often negatively affecting caregivers' quality of life (QoL). Objective: This study aimed to develop and test a hypothesized causal model of QoL among Indonesian family caregivers who care for dependent older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in 2024. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted with 270 family caregivers recruited from five Community Health Centers. Data were collected using various scales: the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Zarit Burden Interview, the Duke University Religion Index, the Perceived Knowledge on T2DM Care Scale, the Family-Carer Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and the Quality-of-Life Index. Descriptive statistics and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) were used for analysis. Results: The final model explained 89.1% of the variance in the quality of life (QoL) of family caregivers (R² = 0.893, Adjusted R² = 0.891), with 66% predictive relevance. Depression symptoms had the strongest negative direct effect on QoL, followed by caregiver burden. Self-efficacy and perceived knowledge had positive direct effects, while social support showed no significant direct effect. Indirect effects revealed that social support and self-efficacy positively influenced QoL through depression symptoms. The total effect (TE) analysis confirmed that depression symptoms had the strongest negative effect on QoL (TE = -0.744, p <0.001), while social support (TE = 0.443, p <0.001) and self-efficacy (TE = 0.413, p <0.001) had positive effects. Conclusion: Reducing depression symptoms and caregiver burden, strengthening social support, and promoting self-efficacy could significantly improve the QoL of family caregivers who care for older persons with T2DM. Nursing practice should address caregivers' physical and emotional needs, provide education, foster social support, and support caregiver mental health.
Psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the Quality of Life Index (QLI-I) among family caregivers of dependent older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus Siregar, Rinco; Kritpracha, Charuwan; Chinnawong, Tippamas; Latour, Jos M.
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 11 No. 4 (2025): July - August
Publisher : Belitung Raya Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3929

Abstract

Background: The quality of life (QoL) of family caregivers supporting older persons with functional dependence due to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a growing concern. Accurately assessing caregiver well-being requires culturally appropriate, valid, and reliable instruments. However, such tools remain limited in the Indonesian context. Objective: This study aimed to translate the Quality of Life Index (QLI) into Indonesian and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version (QLI-I) among family caregivers of dependent older persons with T2DM. Methods: Brislin’s back-translation method was used to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence in the translation process. Content validity was assessed by a panel of five experts. Psychometric evaluation was conducted on a purposive sample of 394 family caregivers recruited from eleven community health centers in Medan, Indonesia. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while convergent validity and construct reliability (CR) were analyzed to assess measurement accuracy. Results: The Indonesian version of the Quality of Life Index (QLI-I) demonstrated strong construct validity, with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.707 to 0.870. CFA indicated an acceptable model fit based on the following indices: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.067, ratio of chi-square to degrees of freedom (CMIN/df) = 2.779, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.906, Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.906, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.814, and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.898. Composite Reliability (CR) values were high across all domains: Health/Functioning (HF) = 0.957, Family (FA) = 0.876, Social/Economic (SE) = 0.924, and Psychological/Spiritual (PS) = 0.922. Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values met the recommended threshold for each domain: HF = 0.633, FA = 0.586, SE = 0.605, and PS = 0.627. All constructs demonstrated acceptable discriminant validity, confirming the distinctiveness of each domain. Conclusion: The QLI-I is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the QoL of family caregivers of dependent older persons with T2DM. Its use in clinical and community settings can support nurses and healthcare professionals in identifying caregiver needs and developing culturally appropriate, evidence-based interventions to enhance caregiver well-being.