Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reform Regulations And Responsibilities Of Beneficial Ownership In Limited Companies In Connection With The Crime Of Money Laundering Saputra, Dhimas; Prasetyo, Handoyo; Wahyudi, Slamet Tri
MSJ : Majority Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): MSJ-May
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/msj.v2i2.185

Abstract

In this case, a Limited Liability Company (LLC) can be used to conceal beneficial ownership, which can be a method to cover up money laundering activities. This research aims to explore the role of beneficial ownership in limited liability companies. The research methodology is juridical-normative, employing statutory and conceptual approaches. Secondary data obtained from literature studies is utilized. The position of the beneficial owner (BO) in a limited liability company is not yet specifically regulated within the Indonesian national legal framework. Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 regarding the Implementation of the Principle of Recognizing the Beneficial Owners of Corporations in the Context of Preventing and Eradicating Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Crimes introduces the definition of a BO as an individual who is the ultimate beneficiary or holds the highest level of authority with complete control over the company. The BO's position in the company is based on their rights as outlined in Article 4 Paragraph (1) of Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018, which equates them to a Major Shareholder. A BO holds shares, voting rights, and profit rights exceeding 25%, which surpasses the minimum shareholding requirement for major shareholders of at least 20% in the company.
The Genealogy of Legal Feminism and the Transformation of Indonesian Law: From Critiques of Legal Neutrality to Substantive Justice Saputra, Dhimas; Rahma, Paramita; Ridwan, Salwa Salsabila Aulia; Pirmasyah A B, Narendra; Elviandri, Elviandri
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 6 No. 7: Volume 6 Issue 7, September 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v6i7.4036

Abstract

Introduction: Law is often perceived as neutral and equally applicable to everyone; however, its construction and implementation may reproduce gender inequalities rooted in patriarchal power relations. This condition necessitates a historical and theoretical examination of the development of legal feminism and its relevance to the Indonesian legal system. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to trace the genealogy of legal feminism, analyze the development of its theoretical foundations, and identify its implications for the evolution of Indonesian law. Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research using historical, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials and relevant literature are analyzed qualitatively to examine the relationship between the development of legal feminist thought, the principle of gender equality, and legal regulations on the protection of women in Indonesia. Findings of the Research: Legal feminism has developed as a critique of formal legal neutrality and the dominance of patriarchal perspectives. Its evolution has strengthened an orientation toward substantive equality, recognition of women's experiences, and intersectional analysis. In the Indonesian context, its relevance can be examined through the ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), legislation on the elimination of domestic violence, sexual violence offenses, and judicial guidelines for adjudicating cases involving women in conflict with the law. However, the relationship between theoretical developments and regulatory changes still requires more detailed normative examination.