Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN DISIPLIN BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH TENTANG DISIPLIN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL : Disciplinary Punishment Based on Government Regulations Regarding The Discipline of Civil Servants Phinesia, Elizabeth Liely; Pamungkas, Yogo
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19790

Abstract

The mechanism for imposing disciplinary punishment for Civil Servants is a process that must be passed before being sentenced to disciplinary punishment by an official authorized to punish including summons, examination, sentencing and delivery of decisions. The problem in this study is the process of examining and imposing disciplinary punishment on Ridwan Yasin and the legal consequences. To answer these problems, a normative juridical research type is carried out which is analytical descriptive in nature. The data used are secondary data with primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary obtained through library research. The data that has been obtained from the results of further research will be analyzed using qualitative methods and drawing conclusions by deductive way. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the imposition of disciplinary punishment on Ridwan Yasin in the Decree of the North Gorontalo Regent Number: 800/BKPP/2097/IX/2021 was declared procedurally and substantially flawed.
PENERAPAN ASAS PRADUGA KEABSAHAN (VERMOEDEN VAN RECHTMATIGHEID PREASUMTIO IUSTAE CAUSA) DALAM PENGUJIAN PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Phinesia, Elizabeth Liely
JURNAL DARMA AGUNG Vol 32 No 5 (2024): OKTOBER
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v32i5.4607

Abstract

Keberadaan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara merupakan salah satu indikator bahwa Indonesia adalah negara hukum. Pengadilan ini berperan penting dalam memastikan keabsahan hukum dalam pelaksanaan administrasi negara, khususnya dengan mengadili tindakan pejabat atau aparatur negara yang melanggar prinsip pemerintahan yang baik serta menyelesaikan sengketa Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN). Dalam menyelesaikan sengketa KTUN, digunakan asas-asas Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, salah satunya adalah asas praduga keabsahan, yang memainkan peran krusial dalam pengambilan keputusan terkait sengketa tersebut. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini berusaha menjelaskan kembali esensi dan pengaruh penerapan asas praduga keabsahan hukum tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal sehingga kajian utama yang dilakukan oleh peneliti fokus pada aturan perundangan, asas, dan norma yang relevan. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam pemahaman yang lebih baik mengenai peran dan pentingnya asas praduga keabsahan dalam konteks Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Kata Kunci: Asas Praduga Keabsahan, Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang ABSTRACT The existence of the State Administrative Court is an indicator that Indonesia is a rule of law country. This court plays an important role in ensuring the validity of the law in the implementation of state administration, in particular by adjudicating the actions of officials or state apparatus who violate the principles of good governance and resolving disputes over State Administrative Decisions (KTUN). In resolving KTUN disputes, the principles of State Administrative Justice are used, one of which is the principle of presumption of legitimacy, which plays a crucial role in making decisions regarding the dispute. Therefore, this article attempts to explain again the essence and influence of the application of the principle of presumption of legal validity. This research uses doctrinal research methods so that the main study carried out by researchers focuses on relevant laws, principles and norms. Thus, it is hoped that this research can contribute to a better understanding of the role and importance of the principle of presumption of legitimacy in the context of State Administrative Justice in Indonesia. Keywords: Principle of Presumption of Validity, State Administrative Decisions, Abuse of Authority