Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing
Dahul, Maria
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparative Analysis of Naïve Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) Algorithms in Stroke Classification Iswara, Ida Bagus Ary Indra; Anandita, Ida Bagus Gede; Dahul, Maria
Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Articles Research Volume 6 Issue 3, July 2024
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/cnahpc.v6i3.4395

Abstract

Stroke, also known as cerebrovascular, is a type of Non-Communicable Disease (NCD). The symptoms of this disease arise due to a blockage (ischemic) or rupture (hemorrhagic) of a blood vessel that disrupts blood flow to the brain. This condition causes a lack of oxygen and nutrients to brain cells, resulting in damage and potentially death. This research aims to compare the use of Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithms in classifying stroke diseases. The research process involves data collection, data validation, data preprocessing, data reading, data transformation, data splitting, model implementation, classification evaluation, application of Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithms, and comparative analysis of results. The variables used in this study include: gender, age, hypertension, heart disease, ever married, work type, residence type, avg glucose level, bmi, smoking status, stroke. Sugar, BMI, Smoking Status, Stroke. Based on the experiments conducted, it was found that the Naive Bayes algorithm achieved an average accuracy rate of 91.67%, while the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithm achieved an average accuracy rate of 95.59%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithm has a higher average accuracy rate than the Naive Bayes algorithm, with a percentage difference in accuracy of 3.92%.
Comparative Analysis of Naïve Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) Algorithms in Stroke Classification Iswara, Ida Bagus Ary Indra; Anandita, Ida Bagus Gede; Dahul, Maria
Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Articles Research Volume 6 Issue 3, July 2024
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/cnahpc.v6i3.4395

Abstract

Stroke, also known as cerebrovascular, is a type of Non-Communicable Disease (NCD). The symptoms of this disease arise due to a blockage (ischemic) or rupture (hemorrhagic) of a blood vessel that disrupts blood flow to the brain. This condition causes a lack of oxygen and nutrients to brain cells, resulting in damage and potentially death. This research aims to compare the use of Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithms in classifying stroke diseases. The research process involves data collection, data validation, data preprocessing, data reading, data transformation, data splitting, model implementation, classification evaluation, application of Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithms, and comparative analysis of results. The variables used in this study include: gender, age, hypertension, heart disease, ever married, work type, residence type, avg glucose level, bmi, smoking status, stroke. Sugar, BMI, Smoking Status, Stroke. Based on the experiments conducted, it was found that the Naive Bayes algorithm achieved an average accuracy rate of 91.67%, while the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithm achieved an average accuracy rate of 95.59%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) algorithm has a higher average accuracy rate than the Naive Bayes algorithm, with a percentage difference in accuracy of 3.92%.
Co-Authors Anandita, Ida Bagus Gede Ida Bagus Ary Indra Iswara