Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Perkawinan Dengan Penderita Gangguan Jiwa Atau Bipolar Arinda, Syifa; Dinda Seplinar Batubara; Keisyah Yuvi Amanda; Latif, Abdul; M. Rifky Abdillah
Tabayyanu : Journal Of Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 02 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Dar Arrisyah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Marriage in Islam is a sacred bond that binds two individuals in a family relationship. However, challenges arise when one partner suffers from bipolar disorder, a mental condition characterized by extreme mood swings. This research aims to analyze Islamic law regarding marriage for bipolar sufferers, examine the views of ulama, and understand how this condition affects the validity and sustainability of marriage. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive-analytical approach to fiqh literature, ulama fatwas, and case studies. The research results show that in Islam, transparency and honesty before marriage are highly prioritized, including disclosure of mental health conditions. Scholars agree that bipolar sufferers still have the right to marry, but the obligation to provide information to their prospective partner is important so that both parties can make the right decision.
Legal Certainty Aspects of Securities as Debt Collateral in Lawsuit Processes Dinda Seplinar Batubara; Keisyah Yuvi Amanda; Devani Agustia; M. Farhan Maulana; Fitra Ardiansyah
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v2i3.931

Abstract

Securities play a strategic role in financial transactions as instruments that can be used as collateral for debt. However, in practice, issues arise regarding the legal certainty of securities in lawsuits, particularly when disputes arise between creditors and debtors. This study aims to examine the extent to which securities provide legal certainty in the process of enforcing creditors' rights through litigation. The research method used is a normative-juridical approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, jurisprudence, and legal doctrine. The results show that although securities such as checks and giro bills have the power to serve as evidence and collateral, their application in judicial practice still faces procedural obstacles and varying legal interpretations. Therefore, strengthening regulations and consistent legal application are needed to ensure legal certainty for the parties.