Al-Noori, Ammar Kh.
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Accuracy of intraoral scanners based on jaw curve and inter-implant distance Mohialdeen, Hasan Khiraldeen; Abdulla, Mohammed A.; Al-Noori, Ammar Kh.; Mohamad, Ashraf Measar
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 57 No. 4 (2024): December
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v57.i4.p241-247

Abstract

Background: In digital dentistry, the intraoral scanner (IOS) is the primary data-collecting device. The data must be accurate to prevent undesirable stresses and technological difficulties resulting from prosthetic misfits. The span length of restorations influences the accuracy of IOS impressions. Purpose: This research aimed to compare the accuracy of virtual models scanned by different IOSs to determine whether jaw curvature and inter-implant distance affect accuracy. Methods: Four mandibular edentulous models were prepared by replacing the site of the missing tooth with an implant. The prepared holes were drilled at 7mm, 14mm, 21mm, and 28mm. Five scans for each model were taken with a desktop laboratory scanner as a reference model and with Trios3Shape and 3Disc Heron IOSs to evaluate trueness and precision (T&P). The scans were saved as standard triangulation language files and statistically analyzed at a level of significance (P ≤ 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference between the IOSs in inter-implant distances (P < 0.05). The greatest distortion was reported in the 21mm and 28mm groups for both scanners (P ≤ 0.05), while the lowest distortion was observed in the 7mm and 14mm groups for the Trios3Shape scanner. Conclusion: Jaw curvature and inter-implant distance impacted the accuracy of the IOS. Distortion and reduced reproducibility of T&P increased with jaw curve and inter-implant distance. The Trios3Shape IOS showed maximum accuracy at 7mm and 14mm inter-implant distances, while the 3Disc Heron IOS produced significant distortion of trueness at 21mm and 28mm inter-implant distances.
Comparative effect of different types of artificial teeth and the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength to CAD/CAM denture base Saleh, Hajar M.; Al-Noori, Ammar Kh.
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 58 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v58.i1.p74-80

Abstract

Background: Complete tooth loss reduces a patient’s quality of life. The most suitable treatment option is complete denture fabrication, which provides an acrylic-based removable prosthesis as a substitute for all dentition and related structures. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three types of artificial teeth—acrylic, composite, and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled denture teeth—and the effects of three surface treatments: bur roughening, air abrasion (AB), and dichloromethane (DCM). Methods: Milled CAD/CAM denture base resin was used to test three types of denture teeth: acrylic, composite, and milled CAD/CAM. A total of 120 maxillary right central incisors were used, with 40 of each tooth type. Each type was divided into four groups based on the treatment surface: control (no treatment), AB, bur roughening, and DCM. Universal testing equipment was used to measure SBS. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA, and Duncan’s multiple range test was applied to compare mean values among groups. Results: Acrylic and CAD/CAM milled teeth demonstrated higher SBS compared with composite teeth. Teeth treated with AB and DCM surface treatments exhibited increased SBS across all tooth types compared with the control groups. Conclusion: Acrylic and CAD/CAM milled teeth show superior SBS compared with composite teeth. AB and DCM treatments effectively enhance SBS in all types of teeth.