Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Teori Sosiologi Hukum Pada Peristiwa Eksploitasi Pengamen dan Anak Jalanan Dibawah Umur Nurdin, Aulia Anjani; Anjani, Axara Alejendra; Rasmitha, Nadia Risa; Alvaro, Radiyya; Manurung, Abraham; Yuli, Yuliana
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 2, No 5 (2024): Madani, Vol. 2, No. 5 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11480564

Abstract

Child welfare is an order of life for children that can guarantee normal growth, both spiritually, physically and socially. The aim of this research is to find out and describe the exploitation of minors. With primary and secondary data types, the data collection technique uses data reduction, presenting the data after the collected data is analyzed and a conclusion is drawn. The results of this research show that the factors causing exploitation of minors are: 1) Low family economy. Their parents' income, which is an average of only 300,000 to 500,000 per month, cannot meet the family's needs, coupled with the relatively large number of family dependents, this creates a heavy burden for low-income families to fulfill their needs. 2) The influence of the child's environment and community, the environment where the child lives and the surroundings the child socializes with, including the child's friends, can be the reason the child takes to the streets. 3) People's low education has an impact on children's education, where parents should have an important role in providing motivation and support for children regarding the importance of education. 4) Cracks and violence in parents' domestic lives, the relationship between parents (father and mother) can influence children take to the streets as there are frequent quarrels between father and mother, separation caused by father or mother leaving home and remarrying or even divorce between father and mother. The suggestion in this research is that parents should be able to carry out their obligations as parents towards their children, such as providing love and not taking away their children's rights, including employing them as newspaper sellers and buskers.
Analisis Kode Etik Profesi Hakim Terhadap Putusan Kasus Penganiayaan Oleh Terdakwa George Ronald Tannur (Studi Kasus Putusan MA NO. 454/PID.B/2024/PN.SBY) Amina, Frahnaz; Najla, Shabrina; Azalea, Shaila; Manurung, Abraham; Fauziyyah, Laila
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14998325

Abstract

Indonesia as a country of law has law enforcement officers to ensure that the law runs well, one of which is the judge. In carrying out their duties, judges must be independent, impartial, and adhere to the principles of justice and legal certainty. To ensure that judges carry out their duties in accordance with the mandate of the constitution, a set of rules is formed as a guideline called the code of ethics for judges. However, in its implementation, the application of the judicial code of ethics still faces various problems, one of which is the practice of gratification or bribery which has the potential to interfere with the independence and integrity of the judiciary. The problems raised in this article are about the Code of Ethics and Guidelines for the Conduct of Judges in Indonesia and violations of the application of the Code of Ethics for the Professional Judges in the case of abuse involving the defendant George Ronald Tannur. Using the normative legal research method, this study analyzes laws and court decisions regarding the George Ronald Tannur case. The code of ethics and guidelines for the conduct of judges in the Indonesian judicial system aim to maintain the integrity and public trust in the judicial institution. However, in practice, violations are still found, such as alleged bribery in the George Ronald Tannur case. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen supervision by the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission to improve the integrity and professionalism of judges.