Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice
Saadat, Zahra
Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Is It Time to Review our Educational Program for the Electrocardiography Operators? Saadat, Habibollah; Tajdini, Hossein; Saadat, Zahra; Eslami, Vahid; Sheibani, Mehdi; Sharifkashani, Babak; Sadeghi, Roxana; Khaheshi, Isa
International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice Vol 2, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (72.658 KB) | DOI: 10.21859/ijcp-020302

Abstract

No abstract available.
Comparison of Face to Face vs. Group Training on Self-pulse Rate taking Ability of Patients Saadat, Habibollah; Sadeghi, Roxana; Jannatipour, Maryam; Abadi, Alireza; Saadat, Zahra; Alipour Parsa, Saeed
International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice Vol 4, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (539.004 KB) | DOI: 10.21859/ijcp-401

Abstract

Introduction: Determining the rate and regularity of peripheral arterial pulses has a major role in assessing the clinical status of patients with cardiovascular disorders. We compared two training methods on the ability of patients to take their radial pulse rate accurately.Methods: Three-hundred patients were randomly divided into two arms. One arm received individual face-to-face training and the other arm received group training via displaying an animation movie. Immediately after the training and then after 48 hours, the patients were tested by a nurse to find out whether they have learned the correct technique of taking radial pulse rate or not.Results: Immediately after the intervention, 84.9% in face-to-face arm and 81.8% in group training arm were able to correctly count their radial pulse rate (P = 0.536). After 48 hours, 71.7% in face-to-face and 60.8% in group training arm were able to correctly count their radial pulse rate (P = 0.051).Conclusions: Both methods were effective to improve the ability of the patients to count their radial pulse rate correctly though face-to-face method was marginally superior to group training.
Co-Authors Abadi, Alireza Alipour Parsa, Saeed Eslami, Vahid Jannatipour, Maryam Khaheshi, Isa Saadat, Habibollah Sadeghi, Roxana Sadeghi, Roxana Sharifkashani, Babak Sheibani, Mehdi Tajdini, Hossein