Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implikasi Agreement on Agriculture (Aoa/Wto) Terhadap Pengaturan Perdagangan Produk Pertanian Indonesia Roza Nova, Sri Asih
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Maret - April 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i3.1963

Abstract

The aim of this scientific writing is to find out the legal implications of the AoA/WTO for trade in the Indonesian agricultural sector, as well as to find out how Indonesia provides legal protection for trade in agricultural products due to the liberalization of world trade. This scientific research uses normative juridical research methods, and the data collected will be analyzed juridically qualitatively, then the results of this research will be described descriptively analytically. From the research results, the author obtained data that to implement the AoA/WTO provisions, Indonesia updated its legal provisions in the agricultural sector through several national provisions. However, this implementation has implications that have a negative impact on farmers, as a result trade in the Indonesian agricultural sector decreases, such as imports of food products increasing, farmers' income decreasing, there are no subsidies for farmers, food insecurity and hunger, Bulog becomes a company, and etc. To anticipate the negative impact of trade liberalization on the agricultural sector, the Indonesian government has made such efforts, such as enacting Law No. 29 of 2000, concerning the protection of plant varieties, Presidential Decree No. 77 of 2005, concerning the procurement and distribution of subsidized fertilizers, at the beginning of September 2007, The Decree of the Coordinating Minister for the Economy gave full authority to Bulog, in May 2007, the government issued a Draft Government Regulation (RPP) concerning the National Agrarian Reform Program (PPAN) / Landreform, and at the international level, Indonesia created the SP (Special Product) and SSM (Special Product) programs. Safeguard Mechanism) which is still being fought for in the WTO forum to get its ratification.
Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pembatalan dan Penolakan Keputusan Arbitrase Menurut Konvensi New York 1958 dan Implementasi di Indonesia dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Roza Nova, Sri Asih
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1130

Abstract

Current economic developments have an impact on the public's lack of trust in their court institutions, where these court institutions are considered unprofessional, and not independent and even the moral integrity of judges in carrying out their profession has become blurred. Therefore, economic actors who really value time prefer alternative dispute resolution forums outside the court forum to resolve their business disputes which only require a short time and are in line with their business spirit. One of the alternative dispute resolution forums that is widely chosen and most popular among business people is arbitration. Decisions issued by this arbitration body are final and binding, but these decisions can be canceled and rejected as regulated in the 1958 New York Convention and implemented by Indonesia with Law No. 30 of 1999. Therefore, in this research, researchers will analyze how to regulate the annulment and rejection of arbitration decisions based on the two provisions mentioned above. To answer the questions in this research, the author uses normative juridical research methods. The research process will explore data in the form of legal provisions that have been written and are still in effect, as well as forms of information that have been published and the results of the analysis are described using qualitative methods, namely data acquisition methods, data organization. , sorting them into manageable units, synthesizing them, looking for and finding patterns, finding out what is important and what is learned, and deciding what can be used to answer the problem. From this research, the answer was found to be that both the 1958 New York Convention and Law No. 30 of 1999 do not concretely regulate the annulment of arbitration awards, but both regulations allow for the annulment of arbitration awards if they fulfill the requirements. Regarding the rejection of arbitration decisions, it is regulated concretely in article V of the 1958 New York Convention, as well as Law No. 30 of 1999, which also regulates concretely in article 66 letter c.