Articles
<![CDATA[PERBEDAAN MAKNA ALASAN PHK: IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP HAK-HAK PEKERJA DAN KEWAJIBAN PERUSAHAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewangga, Stevanus Andrian]]>;
<![CDATA[Royhan Fakhri Megantara]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1154
<![CDATA[Termination of Employment (PHK) or layoff is a significant action in the world of employment. Differences in the meaning of reasons for layoffs between workers and companies can be a source of complex conflict with significant legal enforcement. This research aims to analyze the differences in the meaning of reasons for layoffs between workers and companies as well as law enforcement regarding workers' rights and company obligations. The research method used is a descriptive analysis approach with reference to statutory regulations and court decisions regarding layoffs. Data was collected through literature studies, analysis of legal documents, and research of related cases in employment courts using a case approach. The research results show that differences in the meaning of reasons for layoffs between workers (Mr. ATNY) and companies (PT. Novell Pharmaceutical Laboratories) can be related to legal interpretation, factual assessment, or subjective perception. Workers may consider that the reasons for layoffs given by the company are invalid or unfair, while the company believes that these reasons are in accordance with applicable legal provisions. This difference in meaning can have a significant impact on workers' rights and company obligations. Therefore, efforts are needed to reach a common understanding regarding the legal interpretation of reasons for layoffs, so that it can help reduce conflict and increase fairness in layoffs.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGGUNAAN TEKNIK DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK ]]>
<![CDATA[Warumboy, Charolin Khristy]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1172
<![CDATA[This research aims to annotate the application of diversion in Decision Number 7/Pid/ Sus.Anak/2019/PN Jap. In this decision, the child was sentenced to imprisonment for 4 (four) months, while the Public Prosecutor (JPU) as law enforcer was obliged to carry out diversion. "How diversion efforts should have been carried out but the facts of the decision did not appear." So it is necessary to carry out legal research as to why the decision did not use diversion first. The enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law) marks a significant step towards providing special protection for children in conflict with the law. In this research, the focus lies on children in conflict with the law. The primary aim of this law is to enhance the regulation of the juvenile criminal justice system, ensuring better treatment and outcomes for children involved in legal conflicts. Legal protection for children is needed so that children receive attention from errors in the application of statutory regulations, which cause physical, mental and social harm. The aim of this research is to discover, describe (describe), and analyze the application of the diversion method in resolving criminal cases by children studying decision number 7/pid/sus.anak/2019/pn jap.]]>
<![CDATA[ANGKA KECELAKAAN KERJA NAIK PENINGKATAN DALAM 8 TAHUN TERAKHIR : PENGIMPLEMENTASIAN PROGRAM ZERO ACCIDENT AWARD ]]>
<![CDATA[Agris Bagus Puta Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Galang Satrio Nugroho]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1198
<![CDATA[This research discusses important aspects in achieving complete mobility in a company, with a focus on labor aspects and Occupational Health and Safety (K3). Even though the company received the "Zero Accident Award" from the Ministry of Manpower for its success in achieving zero work accidents, the increase in the number of accidents in recent years shows the lack of success of this program. This research uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical analysis to identify gaps between regulations for implementing the Zero Accident Award program and field practice. The research results show the need for continuous improvement in risk management and work accident prevention in companies.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KEADILAN RESTORATIF KEJAKSAAN DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Ndruru, Grace]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1230
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the process of peace efforts based on restorative justice in the prosecutor's office which only stops at issuing a decree to terminate the prosecution. implementation of restorative justice implemented by the prosecutor's office which has not been able to comply with the principle of legal certainty. So far, the process of seeking peace at the prosecutor's office only stops with a letter of decision to terminate the prosecution, in which the representation of the prosecutor's office as a peacemaker only targets peace between the suspect and the victim. in other words, there is no target for fulfilling the responsibilities that should be given to victims. Legal certainty is a guarantee of certainty that the law is running well without any arbitrary action, which means that rights and obligations are fulfilled. If legal certainty is achieved then each party gets the same rights. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this research explain that case resolution based on restorative justice in the prosecutor's office between perpetrators, victims and the prosecutor's office itself has not been able to fulfill the principle of legal certainty. This is because the prosecutor's efforts and pursuit are only to achieve peace, without considering the aspects of responsibility that must be fulfilled by the parties involved and bound. In the sense that Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 does not fulfill the principle of legal certainty.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Putusan Bebas Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Golongan I ]]>
<![CDATA[Sharif, Matthew]]>;
<![CDATA[Edgard Naba Rivalio]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Juli - Agustus 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Review Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2242
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini menganalisis putusan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor 679/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Mtr terkait penyalahguna narkotika golongan 1 jenis metamfetamin. Meskipun Jaksa Penuntut Umum menuntut hukuman penjara 14 tahun dan denda Rp. 1.000.000.000, Terdakwa diputus dengan putusan bebas karena unsur delik dalam pasal-pasal yang didakwakan tidak terpenuhi akibat ketiadaan barang bukti fisik narkotika. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif untuk menganalisis kaidah hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis Normatif yaitu menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tindak pidana narkotika golongan 1. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam unsur Pasal 114 ayat (2) jo 132 ayat (1) dan Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Narkotika, terdapat frasa Narkotika yang selama ditafsir bahwa Narkotika harus dibuktikan secara fisik pada saat penangkapan, namun pada putusan aquo terdapat kesesuaian antara alat bukti yang bisa menunjukkan bahwa terdapat narkotika sebagai bagian dari unsur pidana, kesesuaian alat buktinya seperti hasil laboratorium seperti tes urine, Saksi a de charge yang pada pokoknya menerangkan bahwa terdakwa menggunakan narkotika. Penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa pembuktian tindak pidana narkotika seharusnya tidak hanya terpaku pada barang bukti fisik, tetapi juga mempertimbangkan kesesuaian alat bukti yang relevan untuk memastikan adanya unsur narkotika sebagaimana dalam rumusan pasal.]]>
<![CDATA[PERBEDAAN MAKNA ALASAN PHK: IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP HAK-HAK PEKERJA DAN KEWAJIBAN PERUSAHAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewangga, Stevanus Andrian]]>;
<![CDATA[Royhan Fakhri Megantara]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1154
<![CDATA[Termination of Employment (PHK) or layoff is a significant action in the world of employment. Differences in the meaning of reasons for layoffs between workers and companies can be a source of complex conflict with significant legal enforcement. This research aims to analyze the differences in the meaning of reasons for layoffs between workers and companies as well as law enforcement regarding workers' rights and company obligations. The research method used is a descriptive analysis approach with reference to statutory regulations and court decisions regarding layoffs. Data was collected through literature studies, analysis of legal documents, and research of related cases in employment courts using a case approach. The research results show that differences in the meaning of reasons for layoffs between workers (Mr. ATNY) and companies (PT. Novell Pharmaceutical Laboratories) can be related to legal interpretation, factual assessment, or subjective perception. Workers may consider that the reasons for layoffs given by the company are invalid or unfair, while the company believes that these reasons are in accordance with applicable legal provisions. This difference in meaning can have a significant impact on workers' rights and company obligations. Therefore, efforts are needed to reach a common understanding regarding the legal interpretation of reasons for layoffs, so that it can help reduce conflict and increase fairness in layoffs.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGGUNAAN TEKNIK DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK ]]>
<![CDATA[Warumboy, Charolin Khristy]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1172
<![CDATA[This research aims to annotate the application of diversion in Decision Number 7/Pid/ Sus.Anak/2019/PN Jap. In this decision, the child was sentenced to imprisonment for 4 (four) months, while the Public Prosecutor (JPU) as law enforcer was obliged to carry out diversion. "How diversion efforts should have been carried out but the facts of the decision did not appear." So it is necessary to carry out legal research as to why the decision did not use diversion first. The enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law) marks a significant step towards providing special protection for children in conflict with the law. In this research, the focus lies on children in conflict with the law. The primary aim of this law is to enhance the regulation of the juvenile criminal justice system, ensuring better treatment and outcomes for children involved in legal conflicts. Legal protection for children is needed so that children receive attention from errors in the application of statutory regulations, which cause physical, mental and social harm. The aim of this research is to discover, describe (describe), and analyze the application of the diversion method in resolving criminal cases by children studying decision number 7/pid/sus.anak/2019/pn jap.]]>
<![CDATA[ANGKA KECELAKAAN KERJA NAIK PENINGKATAN DALAM 8 TAHUN TERAKHIR : PENGIMPLEMENTASIAN PROGRAM ZERO ACCIDENT AWARD ]]>
<![CDATA[Agris Bagus Puta Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Galang Satrio Nugroho]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1198
<![CDATA[This research discusses important aspects in achieving complete mobility in a company, with a focus on labor aspects and Occupational Health and Safety (K3). Even though the company received the "Zero Accident Award" from the Ministry of Manpower for its success in achieving zero work accidents, the increase in the number of accidents in recent years shows the lack of success of this program. This research uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical analysis to identify gaps between regulations for implementing the Zero Accident Award program and field practice. The research results show the need for continuous improvement in risk management and work accident prevention in companies.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PENGIDAP NECROPHILIA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN MAYAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Siahaan, Vania Romasta]]>;
<![CDATA[Gita Rismawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1225
<![CDATA[This research examines necrophilia as a sexual orientation deviation that has not been regulated in the National Criminal Code. The National Criminal Code Article 271 focuses on corpses, digging up or dismantling graves, taking, moving or transporting corpses and treating corpses in an uncivilized manner while the rape of corpses is not regulated in the National Criminal Code. Thus, there is a legal vacuum. This is a new problem because the status of necrophilia is mentioned as a form of disease so how is the form of responsibility. The purpose of this study is to find out how the regulation and form of criminal liability for perpetrators who have necrophilia in the crime of corpse rape. The research method used in this writing is juridical-normative legal research, using a statutory approach in order to discuss legal issues in this research. The results of this study found that criminal liability for people with necrophilia in the crime of corpse rape is basically not clearly regulated in the new Criminal Code. From the perspective of criminal acts, it is regulated in Article 271 of Law Number 1 Year 2023 (National Criminal Code) and from the perspective of the crime of rape, it is formulated in Article 415 of the National Criminal Code. While the crime against the corpse itself is regulated in Article 415 of the National Criminal Code and Article 271 of the new Criminal Code, Article 269 of the National Criminal Code and Article 270 of the National Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KEADILAN RESTORATIF KEJAKSAAN DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Ndruru, Grace]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1230
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the process of peace efforts based on restorative justice in the prosecutor's office which only stops at issuing a decree to terminate the prosecution. implementation of restorative justice implemented by the prosecutor's office which has not been able to comply with the principle of legal certainty. So far, the process of seeking peace at the prosecutor's office only stops with a letter of decision to terminate the prosecution, in which the representation of the prosecutor's office as a peacemaker only targets peace between the suspect and the victim. in other words, there is no target for fulfilling the responsibilities that should be given to victims. Legal certainty is a guarantee of certainty that the law is running well without any arbitrary action, which means that rights and obligations are fulfilled. If legal certainty is achieved then each party gets the same rights. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this research explain that case resolution based on restorative justice in the prosecutor's office between perpetrators, victims and the prosecutor's office itself has not been able to fulfill the principle of legal certainty. This is because the prosecutor's efforts and pursuit are only to achieve peace, without considering the aspects of responsibility that must be fulfilled by the parties involved and bound. In the sense that Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 does not fulfill the principle of legal certainty.]]>
