Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Intension to Use Cross-Border QRIS as A Payment Method Santi, Bestari Nirmala; Chalid, Dony Abdul
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : PT Mattawang Mediatama Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.qems2750

Abstract

Aligned with the goal of the Indonesian Payment System 2025 to accelerate inclusive finance, develop MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises), streamline transactions, and enhance economic growth, the government has implemented cross-border QRIS payment system cooperation with Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore. Technology Acceptance Model/TAM, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2/UTAUT2, user system trust theories (perceived trust and perceived security), and financial literacy are integrated to identify factors influencing the intention to use cross-border QRIS. The research method is quantitative using SEM (Structural Equation Modeling), data collected through online questionnaires distributed to cross-border QRIS users. The total number of participant respondents is 356, and the data obtained are processed using SmartPLS application. The data analysis results from this study show that the intention to use QRIS cross-border is only significantly and positively affected by perceived usefulness, habit, and then hedonic motivation.
A Juridical Review of Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2024 from the Perspective of Justice and Its Legal Standing in the Tax Court Santi, Bestari Nirmala; Miracle Kusen, Gabriel Chivalry; Sindra , William Christopher; Anggraini , Yessy
Jurnal sosial dan sains Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): Jurnal Sosial dan Sains
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i9.32442

Abstract

This study examines the legal status and justice implications of SEMA 2/2024 in tax dispute cases, particularly regarding the restriction on the use of evidentiary documents in court proceedings. SEMA 2/2024 adopts the provision of Article 26A paragraph (4) of the KUP Law, which prohibits the use of documents not submitted during the audit or objection stage as admissible evidence before the Tax Court. The approach used is normative juridical research by analyzing statutory regulations and court decisions. The findings indicate that SEMA, which does not hold a place within the formal hierarchy of legislation, should not be used to restrict evidentiary rights already guaranteed by Articles 76 and 78 of the Tax Court Law. The provision in SEMA 2/2024 potentially hinders the principle of material truth and disadvantages taxpayers both procedurally and substantively. It also poses a risk of legal uncertainty and violates the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori. Therefore, an evaluation of the implementation of this SEMA is necessary to ensure harmony between administrative norms and the principle of justice in tax dispute resolution.
Juridical Analysis of the One Month Notice Provision for Employee Resignation: A Balance between Workers’ Rights and Company Operational Protection Sijabat, Candra Robasa; Santi, Bestari Nirmala; Sumaryoto, Otto; PN, Sugeng Santoso
Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan Vol 21 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Kebijakan Ketenagakerjaan Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47198/jnaker.v21i1.704

Abstract

The provision regarding worker resignation with a 30 (thirty) day or one-month notice has long been regulated in Indonesian labor laws. This provision aims to ensure legal certainty for workers while safeguarding the continuity of company operations. However, in practice, the application of the one-month notice often raises debates regarding its effectiveness and proportionality. This issue becomes more significant when the resignation involves workers in strategic positions. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the one-month notice provision in ensuring legal certainty for workers and in protecting company operations based on labor regulations in Indonesia. The research uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The analysis is based on the theory of legal certainty and the theory of balance of interests. The results of the study show that, normatively, the one-month notice provision has provided procedural legal certainty for workers, particularly in relation to the fulfillment of administrative and normative rights. However, this provision has not been fully effective in protecting company operations, especially when workers in strategic positions resign. In such cases, the standard notice period may not provide sufficient time for companies to prepare operational adjustments. Therefore, efforts are needed to harmonize the regulation through a more flexible and proportional arrangement of the resignation notification period. One possible approach is to diversify the notice period based on job characteristics, urgency, and the potential operational impact. This approach is expected to create a better balance between workers' rights and the sustainability of company operations in a fair and sustainable manner.